| ▲ | Pinkert 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Using a v3 onion address as both the cryptographic identity and the NAT traversal layer is such a clean architectural choice. No STUN/TURN servers, no hole punching, you just boot the script and Tor handles routing. For those who use Tor regularly for things other than web browsing: how bad is the real-world latency for pushing a ~20KB Opus audio chunk over Tor these days? Are we talking a 2-3 second delay, or is it much worse? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | smalltorch 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The real world delay is about 2-3 seconds your spot on. I initially started with a full duplex version but it was absolutely terrible. Walkie talkie kinda forces the recieve, listen, response from the users so the latency isn't as much of an issue. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nunobrito 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STUN/TUN are important because of bandwidth. With STUN the bandwidth used is only between the two connected devices, with VPN like Tor there is a bandwidth cost on all the servers where this data is passing. This is a big blocker for anyone hosting the service on a VPS with a few GB of traffic data per month. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | idiotsecant 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beep boop | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||