It's funny how people think they're disabling swapping just because they don't have a swap file. Where do you think mmap()-ed file pages go? Your machine can still reclaim resident file-backed pages (either by discarding them if they're clear or writing them to their backing file if dirty) and reload them later. That's.... swap.

Instead of achieving responsiveness by disabling swap entirely (which is silly, because everyone has some very cold pages that don't deserve to be stuck in memory), people should mlockall essential processes, adjust the kernel's VM swap propensity, and so on.

Also, I wish we'd just do away with the separation between the anonymous-memory and file-backed memory subsystems entirely. The only special about MAP_ANONYMOUS should be that its backing file is the swap file.

▲

kevin_thibedeau 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

mmap is not swap. It's using the same virtual memory mechanisms to load/dump pages to disk. The policy for when to read and write those pages is completely different.

	▲	Dylan16807 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		When the room for memory mapped files gets low enough you get bad thrashing anyway, so the policy difference isn't that important. Having no swap limits how much you can overburden your computer, but you also hit problems earlier. Here's some example numbers for 64GB of memory: With swap you can go up to 62GB of active program data (85GB allocated and used) before you have performance issues. Without swap you can go up to 45GB of active program data (63GB allocated and used) before you hit a brick wall of either thrashing or killing processes. The no-swap version is better at maintaining snappiness within its happy range, but it's a tradeoff.
	▲	quotemstr 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		It is doing exactly what swap is doing. That it's swap with a different policy doesn't make it not-swap. Also, that separate policy shouldn't even exist. For LRU/active-list/inactive-list purposes, why does it matter whether a page is anonymous or file-backed? If you need it, you need it, and if you don't, you don't. No reason for anonymous and file-backed memory to be separate sub-sub-systems under vm.

▲

retrac 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The ghost of Multics walks yet the page tables awaiting recorporealization.