Remix.run Logo
LatencyKills 3 hours ago

> scientific studies grasping for explanations to spiritual things always give me a smile.

There are no "spiritual" things. Everything we experience is based upon biology and chemistry. Where do you think the "chills" come from if not synaptic firing?

elemesmedve 3 hours ago | parent [-]

There are only "spiritual" "things". Where do you think "biology", "chemistry" and "synapses" come from?

LatencyKills 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

They are the result of an infinite and ever expanding cosmos; absolutely no magic thinking or beliefs are required. I don't need to pretend that magic exists just because processes are complex.

elemesmedve 2 hours ago | parent [-]

What I'm getting at is the difference between subjective experience ("chills") and any theory describing it. ("Qualia", "no amount of simulating water will make anything wet", etc.)

Although personally I prefer scientific theories to describe reality (they are still the best/most useful), our experience is never "based" on theories.

LatencyKills 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Well then we agree. I'm just not a fan of using the term "spiritual" for a physical event. No need to ascribe "chills" in a hand-wavy manner.

tummler an hour ago | parent [-]

Why does the term “spiritual” bother you so much? Perhaps interrogate that.

fragmede 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

They were created by magic Gaia energy spirit beings, obviously. Or God, if that is your desired flavor. Or the beings in control of the simulation we're living in.

2 hours ago | parent [-]
[deleted]