| It's a very minor distinction, but they aren't a epaper display (low refresh rate, zero power to maintain an image), rather the technology is a sharp memory LCD (ludicrously low power, but high refresh rate). They're extremely neat and don't suffer from the washed out color and ghosting that epaper does, at the cost of needing ever so slightly above no power to keep an image displayed. I much, much prefer them even though Sharp doesn't really advertise them anymore. https://sharpdevices.com/memory-lcd/ |
| |
| ▲ | drum55 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I haven't really heard it being used like that, always heard e-paper being used as the specific e-ink displays and never anything else. The only time I've seen the (in my mind) confused messaging is on Pebble's own website, I still have my original Pebble Time somewhere, and that's a good part just down to how much I love those displays. I don't think I'd have used one for years if they were epaper. | | |
| ▲ | jsheard 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | > The only time I've seen the (in my mind) confused messaging is on Pebble's own website Yeah, other wearable manufacturers who use the same display technology usually call it MIP instead. Pebble are pretty much the only ones who call it e-paper, which has led some to think theirs is a distinct thing, but it's just MIP. |
| |
| ▲ | cubefox 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Isn’t e-paper the general category of low power displays? Yes, or more precisely: reflective displays without backlight. There were many such display technologies a while ago (when the Kindle took off and various companies tried to compete with E Ink), but most have since been abandoned. Pretty much all colored e-paper screens have much lower contrast than color printing on paper, since they mix colors by using can conventional RGB sub-pixels and darkening them individually, just like regular lit screens, which reduces the amount of reflected light. | | |
| ▲ | ssl-3 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Pretty much all colored e-paper screens have much lower contrast than color printing on paper, since they mix colors by using can conventional RGB sub-pixels and darkening them individually, just like regular lit screens, which reduces the amount of reflected light. Isn't that how color images printed paper works, too? We use inks (often in CMYK coloration, but a galaxy of other options exist) to subtract light from what would otherwise be reflected by a plain white paper. What makes e-paper screens worse in this way? | | |
| ▲ | drum55 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | They more or less have colored particles hanging around in goop and those get pushed around within a small sealed cell by electrostatic charges, there’s presumably some fundamental limit on the total quantity of the colored particles within the cell that’s quite low. I think modern displays have 4 different colored particles in each cell implying only a small portion of the contents is viewable most of the time. On paper you can have basically 100% saturation of whatever color you want in one area. | |
| ▲ | cubefox 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Isn't that how color images printed paper works, too? No. When you print a piece of paper some color, e.g. red, it will be completely red. But most e-paper screens will only be 33% red (optimistically) and 66% black. This is because physical pixels usually can't change color themselves, only brightness, so you use three of them, and darken the RGB components, to produce a colored pixel. For displaying white on color e-paper screens you will have three non-dark RGB sub-pixels, but each color component only reflects at most a third of the incoming spectrum, either red, green, or blue wavelengths, while white paper (or monochromatic e-paper screens) will reflect all three wavelengths everywhere. | | |
| ▲ | drum55 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | That’s not really correct, modern color eink displays actually change color, there’s different pigments inside each cell and others are created visually using dithering. Only the older type are monochrome displays with a color filter behaves like you’re describing. https://www.eink.com/tech/detail/How_it_works | | |
| ▲ | jsheard 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Multi-pigment panels exist but in practice nearly all color e-readers still use the filter-based panels, because they are so much cheaper. There are zero Kindle or Kobo models with the multi-pigment technology. | | |
| ▲ | drum55 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The ReMarkable devices are E Ink Gallery 3 multi pigment display, I have one on my desk. | | |
| ▲ | jsheard 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I did say nearly all, and the price of the ReMarkable Pros reflects on how expensive the Gallery panels still are. |
|
| |
| ▲ | cubefox 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah, E Ink Gallery is the only real exception to the rule with full color support. (The store signage can also change colors, but they don't support color mixing, so there are just three or four colors in total.) Unfortunately, even after 10 years, E Ink Gallery is still far behind colored paper in quality. I think fundamentally their approach to e-paper (electrophoresis displays) is just not suited for full color. |
|
|
|
|
|
