I've looked into the Courtdesk service. It's a stream of events from the courts, as they happen. They claim up to 12,000 updates in a 24 period, aggregated, filtered and organised. While court judgements are public, I don't know if the information Courtdesk provides is. This is a worrying direction.

▲

nine_k 4 hours ago | parent [-]

If the sources of these event data are not public, your worry would be understandable. But if not public, what are these sources then?

	▲	dathinab 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		They are non-propagated/effectively hidden. If you don't "know about them from another source" you can't effectively find/access the information and you might not even know that there is something you really should know about. The service bridged the gap by providing a feed about what is potentially relevant for you depending on your filters etc. This mean with the change: - a lot of research/statistics are impossible to do/create - journalists are prone to only learning about potentially very relevant cases happening, when it's they are already over and no one was there to cover it
	▲	harel 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I kept digging and reached the service https://www.courtserve.net. Seems like a windows application (old school one) that receives the data, but I need more time to explore there. They've been working with MoJ for 20 years (their claim). Initially I thought they have people at the courts live reporting but that's a bit of a stretch...