| ▲ | luqtas 15 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
https://portal.amelica.org/ameli/journal/181/1813954027/html... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| [deleted] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ab5tract 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> The forest itself, paleo-scientists of all stripes say, is much more domesticated than previously thought. This implies that the biodiversity is a result of (or, at the very least, supported by) the indigenous practices, which is a far cry from your claim that biodiversity suffered from those practices. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||