| ▲ | I Love Board Games: A Personal Obsession Explained by Psychology(thesswnetwork.com) |
| 47 points by Propolice 5 days ago | 32 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | jader201 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Board games are my favorite way to accomplish two things that I find hard to do as an introvert that works from home: 1. Getting off screens 2. Socializing But it still also accomplishes one of my favorite things to do: thinking — specifically problem solving and optimizing. And, as an introvert, socializing actually naturally is secondary in our group, but that’s ok — a good heavy heads-down board game (think 3-5 hours) is still quite enjoyable in the presence of other human beings. A bit of a lost art in the day of the “black mirror” (cell phones). If you haven’t tried getting into board games lately, I highly recommend it. If you don’t know where to start, I’d be happy to offer suggestions! |
| |
| ▲ | DauntingPear7 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | As a college student without too much spending money, what’re some board games I should check out? I have wingspan, catan, and azul and wanna expand my collection with other must have games | | |
| ▲ | r-johnv 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | +1 to shoo for the bgg links! BoardGameGeek is the place to read up on games before buying them. On the 'without spending money' front, depending on the city where you live, there often are board game cafes where you can go to rent games and play over there. More economical if you are playing the game once or want to try out different games. Also very good if you struggle with learning rules from the rulebook. | |
| ▲ | mg74 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Get a 1830 variant (e.g. 18Chesapeake) and Age of Steam. Also any Splotter game (Indonesia just got a new printing). A new Brass will come to Kickstarter very soon, that could be a good choice. A pax game would be good to, Pax Pamir 2ed is a good choice. | |
| ▲ | jader201 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Also agree with the other great suggestions in the sibling comments. One thing that would help if you could figure out the types of games you and your group might enjoy — or the type of group you and your friends are. If you think you’d enjoy deeper strategy games, start with some of the popular games in the “strategy” category on BGG, looking for light to medium weight (1.5-2.5) to start out, working your way up the scale (to 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0). If you’re more into the social/party type games (those are always more fun in larger groups), look at the party category. I particularly enjoy social deduction games in the right group, and those are usually big hits with older kids / younger adults (though I still enjoy social deduction games and I’m quite beyond “younger adult”). :) One good example is One Night Ultimate Werewolf. One tip: if you’re interested in trying out some strategy games that are a bit out of your price range, check out boardgameoracle.com and add price alerts on a few games you have your eye on. Many great board game sites run good deals (gamenerdz.com is one of my favorites), so you can often get good deals on games if you’re patient. If you ever get to the point where you’re looking for something with a bit more depth, and are ok spending money, but you want the money to go a long way, Age of Steam is one of the best bangs for your buck. It’s basically a system that has a library of probably close to 200 maps, where each map can change the game quite drastically, by tweaking several rules, in addition to a different map of course. It’s currently my #1 game, and you could repeat plays with it without it getting old, assuming others enjoy the mechanics of game (route building, auction/bidding, tight economy). | |
| ▲ | pavel_lishin 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'm not the person you asked, but I'd highly recommend Splendor. Very easy to learn, very fun to play. | | | |
| ▲ | throw_await 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I can recommend Stardew Valley. It really captures the same cozyness as the video game, and it's cooperative. | | |
| ▲ | Nition 7 minutes ago | parent [-] | | My only complaint re Stardew multiplayer is because the clock doesn't pause in menus, conversations etc like it does in singleplayer, the game gets a lot less relaxing and more rushed. I wish the day would just be 25% longer when playing in co-op. |
| |
| ▲ | leethargo an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I really like "Root" (for the asymmetry) and "Arcs" (for the openness), although they are quite "heavy" in terms of rules and interactions. | |
| ▲ | toast0 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Does your school have a board game group? If so, consider joining it to expand your effective collection (and perhaps your social group). If not, maybe there's an adjacent group that might also be willing to entertain board games, or it's a group you could found. My college had a gaming, anime, and chess group which anchored my social experience. | |
| ▲ | r-johnv 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | 'Terraforming Mars' is a game that I've come back to more times than I can count. The beauty is that it visually looks really complex and advanced, but the gameplay isn't really that much complex more than wingspan. Over the years I bought the 'prelude' expansion which speeds up the beginning. (Highly recommend) And then once you've played it more than 10-15 times, the Hellas& Elysium adds more maps for variety. | |
| ▲ | shoo 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | +1 to pavel_lishin's Splendor suggestion. There's also Splendour: Duel [1] which is a more complex version of the game designed for 2 players. Another quick, low-complexity game that is easy to teach & pretty good fun is Century: Spice Road [2] Chinatown [3] (re-themed as Waterfall Park [3b] ) is a simple highly interactive game that is basically 100% negotiations between players who are trying to make real estate deals with each other. Can be played in 90 minutes, including rules explanation, plays up to 5. For a more complex asymmetric game that's more focused on engine building, with a healthy dose of negotiation, check out Sidereal Confluence [4]. For more complex games that take a bit longer to play to teach and play, that are largely focused on players doing their own thing ("multiplayer solitaire"), building their engines without much negative player interaction, check out Ark Nova [5] or Terraforming Mars [6]. These might take 3-4 hours or so to finish, provided there's an experienced player to teach everyone the rules. For another moderately complex strategy game with a little more player interaction, check out Brass: Birmingham [7]. Takes around 4.5 hours to finish a 4 player game, including the rules explanation. If you have a group that enjoys complex strategy games and wants something with spikier negative player interactions, where one player's actions can completely wreck another player's plans, check out Barrage [8]. This probably doesn't help "without spending much money"! One trick is to find or create a regular board gaming group where everyone brings along different games. That way if, everyone buys a new game or two every year there's a lot of variety without everyone needing to buy heaps of games. [1] https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/364073/splendor-duel [2] https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/209685/century-spice-roa... [3] https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/47/chinatown [3b] https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/396618/waterfall-park [4] https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/202426/sidereal-confluen... [5] https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/342942/ark-nova [6] https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/167791/terraforming-mars [7] https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/224517/brass-birmingham [8] https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/251247/barrage | | |
| ▲ | r-johnv 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | This is the kind of positivity that I love finding find once going down the rabbit hole of board games today. So make amazing suggestions in this list, including two of my favorites: Terraforming Mars and Brass Birmingham. Just chiming an opinion that Brass Birmingham is high on the complexity scale for beginner board gamers. Or more specifically, high on a frustration scale because there are so many placement restrictions that there are often only 1-2 legal moves to play and figuring out what they are is quite a challenge for people playing the first time. (From experience that we as well as several others we know had on their respective first times) That said, I absolutely love the game! | | |
| ▲ | shoo 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Brass Birmingham [...] there are often only 1-2 legal moves to play and figuring out what they are is quite a challenge for people playing the first time. Also, some of those legal moves will set up a board state that the player taking a turn immediately after you can exploit for a lot more benefit than you got, so not only are the legal builds hard to identify for new players, half of those legal moves are also traps! If new players aren't comfortable learning the hard way, the player who is teaching the game can always call these out, explain what is going to happen & give people the opportunity to redo their move. An alternative strategy game that is less complex than Brass is Friedemann Friese's classic Power Grid (2004) [1]. It has some of the same elements (network expansion, building stuff to make money) and parts of it are highly interactive (auctions!) but it is less complex and doesn't feature so many negative player interactions. The main down side of Power Grid is that some of the "admin" rules are pretty fiddly, but provided there is an experienced player to teach the game & be responsible for the admin, players who are learning don't need to care about the details. [1] https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/2651/power-grid |
|
| |
| ▲ | aaronblohowiak 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | carcassonne! |
|
|
|
| ▲ | mingus88 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > I enjoy solo board gaming—largely because I haven’t fully converted my family yet—but nothing compares to a game night. I’m just going to get this off my chest here because I think a lot of “board game people” might not really understand why their enthusiasm doesn’t catch on with a lot of people I know a decent number of board game “enthusiasts” that will pull out a fancy new game to show off, and spend a couple of hours setting it up and explaining the rules to everyone… And then the next game night its the same thing. Check out this great new game! Let’s set it up and let’s all learn a new set of cards and board. This happens so often to me. These people never want to actually _play_ a game, or at least they can’t get over their obsession to buy new games that I rarely end up playing a game that I just learned the rules to. Next night it’s a new game! It’s exhausting and honestly I tend to avoid board game nights now. And I like games! I had so much fun playing dominoes or simple card games with my friends before board gaming got huge. Because the point was not the actual game, but the time spent with my friends. |
| |
| ▲ | jakespencer 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | As a 20 year “board game person “ I understand what you’re talking about. Many people like playing games, but most “board game people” like learning games. I love playing games and have many games I have played dozens of times (or hundreds if you count digital plays), but an equally enjoyable part of the hobby for me is learning new games. Learning a new game and trying to hold the interlocking systems of rules in my head while trying to deduce optimal strategy is a very enjoyable experience for me. It took me a while (years) to realize how unlike most people I was in this respect. Many people were excited when we first played Settlers of Catan and then Ticket to Ride, so I thought they had the same feelings about learning new games that I did. But ultimately I think they were happy with one or two games and then found the thought of learning new games unpleasant. Whereas I have never grown tired of learning new games. | | |
| ▲ | bombcar 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | The group of people who read the instruction manual for video games, and then the hint guide, and then played a bit - these people love new board games. And you can sometimes get a group of them and try a new game each time! But the average person just wants to play the same game each week for fun - we used to do things like this with cards (poker, bridge, cribbage). |
| |
| ▲ | pavel_lishin 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > These people never want to actually _play_ a game, or at least they can’t get over their obsession to buy new games I get what you're saying, but I'm a wanna-be board game person. I do want to try those games! To me, it's like going to a different restaurant every time you go out. Sure, the point is the time spent, but it doesn't mean that we should go to McDonald's every time. (I say I'm a wanna-be, because I don't have enough of a combination of friends and time to do this, and crucially, those friends also have to be willing to sit down and probably play one round of a new game after spending just as much time learning the rules. But board game nights with new games do happen - we just all know to pick games that at least one person already knows the rules to, or whose rules are short enough to pick up quickly, or whose gameplay goes quickly enough to get multiple rounds in after learning the rules.) | |
| ▲ | jader201 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | As someone that hosts and co-hosts several game nights (once or twice a week, most weeks), the key is to try to feel out the group, and if necessary/helpful/desired, send out "how to play" videos in advance (if they prefer learning that way vs. live). But yeah, see if the group wants to learn a new one vs. playing one they already know. When I set up games for my coworker group, I always send out new options along with a number of games we've already played, and let them pick. (More times than not, they pick a new game.) When I host games with my family, I always bring a bunch of games, both new and already played, and let them pick (these are usually much lighter [easier] games). I'll sometimes suggest a new game if I think they'll like it, and they usually do. The key is to get to know what the group typically enjoys. | |
| ▲ | Fire-Dragon-DoL 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I am into board game and was into complex game because I thought they were more fun to play. Then playing a bunch of Spiel games, where the rulebook is 2 pages and the setup time is 5 minutes, I changed my mind entirely.
I now refuse to buy complex games. I want little rules with a lot of depth. There are many of them, every match is intense and yet you can explain the rules in a few minutes. | | |
| ▲ | dragon96 24 minutes ago | parent [-] | | What does a Spiel game refer to? If you want the ultimate depth:ruleset ratio, come learn Go :) Every game is so different and exciting |
|
|
|
| ▲ | hananova 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| “I” love board games makes no sense in an article clearly entirely confabulated by ai. AI;DR |
| |
|
| ▲ | mikpanko 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| For those interested in going deeper on this topic, I recommend C. Thi Nguyen’s excellent book “The Score: How to Stop Playing Somebody Else’s Game”. |
|
| ▲ | barbs 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I love boardgames too and could wax lyrical about them for ages. Sucks that this article was clearly written by AI. |
| |
| ▲ | gwern 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yep: "The tower itself isn’t just a gimmick; it’s a physical presence that creates tension and anticipation the moment it hits the table. Add the Dark Horde expansion and suddenly the game isn’t just something you play—it’s something you engage with." 100% in Pangram, BTW. But there's enough biographical details and concrete facts that I think he at least wrote the outline before having ChatGPT rewrite it. | |
| ▲ | sssilver 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Man I suffer from this recently. Everything I read feels AI written but because it’s just a guess I get into this loop of questioning myself and then the whole read is ruined for me. I hate it so much. | | |
| ▲ | bspammer an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | This has happened to me so much recently that it’s actually pushing me towards reading proper books. I’m so sick of everything sounding the same. | |
| ▲ | barbs 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | For me, the emdashes and the constant use of "it's not just [X], it's [hyperbolic Y]" gives it away. | |
| ▲ | fragmede 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Was this written by a human? |
|
|
