> Ireland's Culture Minister Patrick O'Donovan said the scheme was the first permanent one of its kind in the world [...] The randomly selected applicants will receive the payments for three years, after which they would not be eligible for the next three-year cycle.

So it's permanent, but the recipients don't get it permanently?

▲

Jtsummers 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The program was run as a trial (time limited, not permanent). They've now made it a permanent program (no time limit, not temporary).

So to answer your question: Yes, it's permanent (or as permanent as any gov't program can be), but the recipients don't get the money for an indefinite span of time (permanently).

▲

15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

ericmcer 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Won't this kind of shaft their employment prospects as well?

Other industries don't move as fast but a 3 year layoff in tech could be a career death sentence.

▲

nemomarx 15 hours ago | parent [-]

Do they have to be unemployed during the grant period? They could still find commissions and other stuff during that time or sell their art. And I guess for an artist either way you have a lot of new portfolio entries?

	▲	Jtsummers 15 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> Do they have to be unemployed during the grant period? No, they're allowed to have other work or earn money from their art. The intent is to subsidize their income, not be their exclusive income for those three years.

▲

close04 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> The randomly selected applicants will receive the payments for three years

Budgets are limited so they can't give to everyone all the time. They give each batch of artists money for 3 years and then move to the next batch. Interesting to see if there's a chance they start looping over.