Remix.run Logo
echelon 4 hours ago

> You do you, but increasing taxes to build products to replace products built by private enterprise sounds like a 180 degree opposite of what Europe needs to prosper.

Shhh, don't tell them.

(Kidding, of course.)

The best solution is skin-in-the-game, for-profit enterprise coupled with rigorous antitrust enforcement.

Companies will go a million times faster than open source. They're greedy and will tear the skin off of inefficiencies and eat them for lunch. That's what they do. Let the system of capitalism work for you. It's an optimization algorithm. One of the very best.

But when companies get too big and start starving off competition, that's when you need to declaw them and restore evolutionary pressure. Even lions should have to work hard to hunt, and they should starve and die with old age to keep the ecosystem thriving.

roblabla 4 hours ago | parent [-]

> The best solution is skin-in-the-game, for-profit enterprise coupled with rigorous antitrust enforcement.

Don't we have enough examples showing that this simply cannot work long-term, because the for-profit enterprises will _inevitably_ grow larger than the government can handle through antitrust? And once they reach that size, they become impossible to rein in. Just look at all the stupid large american corporations who can't be broken up anymore because the corporation has the lobbying power and media budget to make any attempt to enforce antitrust a carrier killer for a politician.

I think it's very myopic to say that corporate structure is the "best solution".

admissionsguy 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

No a bad thing if you desire the corporate power to eventually become the main force shaping the world :)

nickpp 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> to make any attempt to enforce antitrust a carrier killer for a politician

Any example of a politician carrier killed by an attempt to enforce antitrust?

saubeidl 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Biden.

Him putting Lisa Khan in charge of antitrust enraged the tech oligarchs, who then all went MAGA and bought Trump the election.

nickpp 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> went MAGA and bought Trump the election

Didn’t Harris actually raise and spend more than Trump on that election?

saubeidl 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah but the tech spend was way more effective. Elon took over Twitter.

megaman821 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It seems like you have an unfalsifiable belief. If one side raises more money and wins, it because of the money. If one side raises more money and loses, it is still the money because the other side spend it more effectively.

nickpp 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

So no, they didn't "bought Trump the election".

And the fact that a 3rd party supports an opponent does not kill any politician's career. Biden retired by himself, following his own party's pressure. And Harris is still around, I believe.