Remix.run Logo
spaceywilly 3 hours ago

My view on Waymo and autonomous taxis in general is they will eventually make public transit obsolete. Once there is a robotaxi available to pick up and drop off every passenger directly from a to b, the whole system could be made to be super efficient. It will take time to get there though.

But eventually I think we will get there. Human drivers will be banned, the roads will be exclusively used by autonomous vehicles that are very efficient drivers (we could totally remove stoplights, for example. Only pedestrian crossing signs would be needed. Robo-vehicles could plug into a city-wide network that optimizes the routing of every vehicle.) At that point, public transit becomes subsidized robotaxi rides. Why take a subway when a car can take you door to door with an optimized route?

So in terms of why it isn’t a waste of time, it’s a step along the path towards this vision. We can’t flip a switch and make this tech exist, it will happen in gradual steps.

ianburrell 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Automated taxis would still be stuck in traffic. Automation gets couple times in capacity, but the induced demand and extra cars looking for rides and parking will mean traffic.

Automation makes public transit better. There will be automated minibuses that are more flexible and frequent than today's buses. Automation also means that buses get a virtual bus lane. Taxis solve the last mile problem, by taking taxi to the station, riding train with thousands of people, and then taking more transit.

Also, we might discover the advantage of human powered transit. Ebikes are more efficient than cars and give health benefits. They will be much safer than automated cars. Could use the extra capacity for bike and bus lanes.

sagarm 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If everyone in NYC tried to commute in a single-occupancy vehicle, there would be gridlock -- AVs or no.

rootusrootus 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> Human drivers will be banned, the roads will be exclusively used by autonomous vehicles

I basically agree with your premise that public transit as it exists today will be rendered obsolete, but I think this point here is where your prediction hits a wall. I would be stunned if we agreed to eliminate human drivers from the road in my lifetime, or the lifetime of anyone alive today. Waymo is amazing, but still just at the beginning of the long tail.

an hour ago | parent | next [-]
[deleted]
xnx 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I would be stunned if we agreed to eliminate human drivers from the road in my lifetime

It basically happened for horses.

anigbrowl 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Horses don't vote.

xnx 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Neither do cars?

anigbrowl 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Drivers, however, absolutely do. And I do not see enough drivers voting away their own ability to drive any time soon.

xnx 30 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Right, I was pointing out that at some point there was probably a horse-rider constituency as there is a driver constituency today.

semiquaver an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

A few years ago I would have (and did) considered the notion that manually programming was about to turn into a quaint relic and computers would be writing 90%+ of code preposterous. Once an alternative becomes obviously superior things can change very fast.

Jblx2 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Is that:

- I would be stunned if we agree to eliminate human drivers from 100% of roads in the lifetime of anyone alive today.

or

- I would be stunned if we agree to eliminate human drivers from 10% of roads...

...or is there some other percentage to qualify this? I guess I wouldn't expect there to be a decree that makes it happen all at once for a country. Especially a large country like the U.S.. More like, some really dense city will decide to make a tiny core autonomous vehicles only, and then some other cities also do years later. And then maybe it expands to something larger than just the core after 5 or 10 years. And so on...