I am assuming the author doesn’t know much about how this flow actually goes since he didn’t get into that at all.

It is annoying to see a complex field as law being judge by stock prices of some SaaS products or w/e they are basing this on.

Could have at least gave it some effort and interviewed 2-3 people that use these kind of products but that would be too much work surely.

It is not surprising that people that slop like LLMs are so into LLMs

▲

zozbot234 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> It is annoying to see a complex field as law being judge by stock prices of some SaaS products

They're not judging the whole field of law, they're judging the SaaS products themselves. In fact, relevant expertise from humans has probably become more valuable not less, as a result of general AI worflows replacing bespoke SaaS.

	▲	ozgrakkurt 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		As far as I can understand, these tools are not intended for the author and he doesn’t use them. And seems like he didn’t even contact someone that does use them. So I don’t see any connection