> It is annoying to see a complex field as law being judge by stock prices of some SaaS products

They're not judging the whole field of law, they're judging the SaaS products themselves. In fact, relevant expertise from humans has probably become more valuable not less, as a result of general AI worflows replacing bespoke SaaS.

As far as I can understand, these tools are not intended for the author and he doesn’t use them. And seems like he didn’t even contact someone that does use them. So I don’t see any connection