| ▲ | lateforwork an hour ago |
| Here's a screenshot of FrameMaker I just took:
https://imgur.com/a/CG8kZk8 Look at the fancy page layout that was possible in the late 1980s. Can Word do this today? |
|
| ▲ | digitalPhonix an hour ago | parent [-] |
| I think Publisher would be the equivalent to FrameMaker from the Office suite. Publisher from Office ~2016 could definitely do that. Unfortunately I think Publisher has faired even worse than Word in terms of stagnation, and now looks to be discontinued? |
| |
| ▲ | lateforwork an hour ago | parent [-] | | Publisher is the equivalent of InDesign. It was meant for brochures and so on. If you want to write a long technical manual today most people use Word. In that respect we are using less powerful software today than our grandparents. Note: Adobe bought FrameMaker and continues to sell FrameMaker. But Word has captured the market not because of its technical merit but because of bundling. | | |
| ▲ | ferguess_k 33 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I have never written any technical manuals, but I'm surprised that Word is the choice of tool. How does one embed e.g. code easily in the document? I feel there must be a better way to do it, maybe some kind of markdown syntax? Latex? | | |
| ▲ | lateforwork 25 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > How does one embed e.g. code easily in the document? You don't. For APIs and such, documentation is published online, and you don't need Word for that. Word is used in some industries, where printed manual is needed. | | |
| ▲ | ferguess_k 21 minutes ago | parent [-] | | What about the printed manuals? I think they still have some of those not too long ago (e.g. Intel manuals). What was the tool chosen? Very curious to know. Or, maybe a legacy example -- how were the printed manuals of Microsoft C 6.0 written? That was in the early 90s I think. |
|
|
|
|
