Remix.run Logo
MPSimmons 4 hours ago

The contagious nature of yawning is so weird. It has to be evolutionarily advantageous because it's so wide spread, but it's also non-obvious.

nickthegreek 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I literally yawned as I clicked on this article from my RSS reader. The contagious nature at the mere idea of a yawn is wild.

embedding-shape 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I yawned as I read the title on the frontpage. Smiled a bit when I read the rest of the comments. Contagious beyond physical proximity sure is wild.

carlmr 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I yawned when I read your comment.

davidw 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Me too but I also wonder how much I'm influenced by knowing that that is supposed to happen.

InsideOutSanta 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I want to yawn, but I'm fighting it. Not all heros wear capes.

B-Con 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yawing seems like it must be adventurous, the contagious part not so much.

Even the mention of a yawn can trigger it.

Perhaps we are almost always in a state of needing a yawn, but the trigger is seldom met, and seeing or hearing about it is enough to make our brain go "oh yeah I forgot about that".

Perhaps yawning is actually underdeveloped and an ideal human would yawn at regular intervals without any prompting.

kakacik an hour ago | parent [-]

Not so much if you think about if from security point of view of our ancestors. Those 1-2s if we talk about proper yaw you are defenseless and clueless, its actually pretty dangerous during say high speed drive on tightly packed highway (as in every single car in all lanes goes too fast to handle any major driver's mistake). But its great for equalizing pressure in ear via eustach tube without the need to block & blow your nose, something both mountaineers/paragliders and divers are well aware of.

Same goes for sneezing, actually that's even worse for driving, I literally don't see anything for a second at least. Sometimes can be blocked, sometimes not so much.

adrianmonk an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There's probably a strong survival advantage in convincing whoever is leading a meeting that it's time to adjourn.

clscott 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

A trait doesn’t have to be advantageous to persist just non-detrimental.

rtkwe 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yeah that's (to me) a more accurate framing, also evolution is bad at revisions so even if there are minor disadvantages to a setup so long as it's not affecting your ability to have and raise kids it's basically completely absent as far as evolution is concerned. For example there are some wild inefficiencies in body layout left over from fish body patterns where the nerve from the brain to the voice box wraps down around your aortic arch because the relative position of the throat, brain, and heart were very different in fish so the path it took then was more direct. It happens in humans and most hilariously in giraffes where it goes all the day down their enormous necks.

samus an hour ago | parent | next [-]

That remains as it is because it's very difficult to evolve away from. Evolution is very good at chasing and sticking around local optima. Big changes are risky.

cyanydeez 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If Giraffe could speak, would they then be perceptibly delayed compared to humans?

seszett 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Well they make no sound, so that might be related. Maybe it's just really impossible because of this.

frisbm 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

and not even that, I'd narrow it further to not detrimental before and during the prime reproductive periods of a species. After that period, detrimental traits are totally fair game and more dependent on technology, culture, and family care dynamics. Heart disease later in life caused by genetic predisposition to high cholesterol isn't something people generally select for or against in a partner, but its effects happen later in life well after people have children so it passes on.

toasterlovin 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Heart disease later in life caused by genetic predisposition to high cholesterol isn't something people generally select for or against in a partner, but its effects happen later in life well after people have children so it passes on.

That depends. It can still affect genetic fitness if it affects an individual's ability to confer benefits on their descendants. Of note: most of the most wealthy and influential people in our society are beyond their reproductive years (not technically true for men, but mostly true in practice).

samus an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Parents must also be alive for long enough to care for their children until they can sustain themselves.

EA-3167 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They can be detrimental too, especially if they're linked to beneficial traits. The test is ultimately whether or not the harm done is sufficiently disadvantageous that it interferes with reproductive fitness. Baldness is arguably detrimental, but it's linked to a bunch of recessive genes that function in other ways, and it doesn't impact us until we're likely to have already reproduced.

That's a simplification, but you get the idea.

TheGRS 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Peacocks with their giant tail feathers are my favorite example. They make flying really difficult, but they make attracting female mates much easier. The reproduction need wins.

AngryData an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I don't know if I would consider it especially difficult for them. It is obviously not convenient but when I had peacocks they would still fly way up in some tall pine trees to roost even with a full tail without too much trouble. That said these were domestic peacocks so they didn't have to fly very far at all for everything they ever wanted, wild peacocks might have to go farther.

awesome_dude 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

And that, my friends, is why I bought a Pontiac...

CGMthrowaway 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It is detrimental though. It is socially impolite to yawn in public.

Edit: why am I being downvoted for this?

bc569a80a344f9c 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Even if yawning in public affected sexual fitness: how long has it been socially impolite to yawn in public? Evolution takes a rather long time in species with long reproductive cycles. Almost all mammals yawn, it would take significant genetic changes to breed that out of us. That doesn't happen overnight.

CGMthrowaway 3 hours ago | parent [-]

400-500 years minimum (15-20 generations), although point taken

JoshTriplett 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> It is socially impolite to yawn in public.

No, it isn't. It can be socially impolite to yawn unexcused, when someone is talking to you, as it has come to be interpreted as boredom rather than tiredness or similar. But it isn't inherently impolite to, for instance, yawn when walking down the street, or in a setting where someone isn't talking to you.

weinzierl an hour ago | parent [-]

In my (limited) experience it is quite culturally dependent.

What you describe is in my opinion true for western cultures. In Brazil they are not so relaxed about it. Asia even less so.

victorbjorklund 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I wonder if that has always been the case or if it is a modern thing (modern in the sense of our evolutionary history).

avazhi 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> why am I being downvoted for this?

Because you don’t know what detrimental means in this context and clearly don’t understand evolutionary timescales?

frisbm 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

is it so detrimental that it leads to a person never finding a mate and reproducing? Maybe for a totally extreme outlier, but probably not

CGMthrowaway 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Is that the right criteria? A trait must be completely, 100% disqualifying as a mate or else it sticks around?

Our ancestors used to have tails. We no longer have tails. Plenty of people wear artificial tails today and get laid, it's not a 100% disqualifying trait

samus an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Our primate ancestors required tails so they could effectively move around on trees. A tree dweller without a functional tail is slower and has a harder time gathering food and escaping from predators. That's a very strong selection pressure that ends up maintaining the tail.

When the woods in eastern Africa changed into savannah, we shifted to two legs and adopted a persistence hunting strategy. The tail became useless, even a liability, and mutations that resulted in reduced tails were not selected against anymore.

vizzier 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Natural selection doesn't require 100% disqualifying, it just needs a slight preference and a shit load of time.

CGMthrowaway 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes that is more along the lines I was thinking

kace91 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>Plenty of people wear artificial tails today and get laid

…Do they? What did I miss?

2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
HPsquared 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's a bit like laughing. Synchronise the mood of the group. I assume other mammals have contagious yawns too?

wjb3 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think you're onto something here. Does anyone know if there are examples of very non-social species yawning (i.e., something that has a brief mating period with no prolonged pair bonding, and then it lays eggs and takes off)?

wjb3 2 hours ago | parent [-]

So, I tried to track down an answer. And, apparently, there’s currently no well-replicated study showing true contagious yawning in a species that is otherwise non-social and non-bonding.

dcrazy 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Cats certainly do.

Strangely, dogs sneeze to show deference.

rudyfink 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

African wild dogs use sneezes to "vote" to make decisions. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rspb/article/284/1862/201...

dylan604 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My cat always responds when I yawn regardless of what room either of us are in.

amelius 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Is yawning contagious between species?

ksenzee 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It is! https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9332820/

Terr_ an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I assumed it was a kind of warning system: "Another member of the tribe detected impairment/fatigue and took measures to become more alert, perhaps you should raise alertness also."

rhcom2 an hour ago | parent [-]

Interesting you went in the opposite direction of my assumption, which was "another member is tired, perhaps we should all pack it it"

kasabali 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

just reading the title made me yawn for real.

marcelbundle 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

got me also

mannycalavera42 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

same here

baggy_trough 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It is strange how well yawning is conserved, even as far back as in reptiles, since it doesn't really seem to do anything.

kgwxd 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Just about all our behaviors are contagious. Scratching, deep breath, emotion, looking in a certain direction, sudden alertness. If yawning were different, that would be weird.

nickthegreek 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Most of those can also be done consciously though. Yawning is different. It is more inline with flatulence, crying, or vomiting. Actions that are in many ways, outside of our direct control.

_factor 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I can yawn on command continuously every few seconds just by thinking about how it feels.

kobalsky 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I can yawn on command. Rumbling my ears and edging swallowing it triggers a yawn 100% of the time

4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
angst_ridden 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

contagi-yawn