|
| ▲ | samus an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| Our primate ancestors required tails so they could effectively move around on trees. A tree dweller without a functional tail is slower and has a harder time gathering food and escaping from predators. That's a very strong selection pressure that ends up maintaining the tail. When the woods in eastern Africa changed into savannah, we shifted to two legs and adopted a persistence hunting strategy. The tail became useless, even a liability, and mutations that resulted in reduced tails were not selected against anymore. |
|
| ▲ | vizzier 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Natural selection doesn't require 100% disqualifying, it just needs a slight preference and a shit load of time. |
| |
|
| ▲ | kace91 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| >Plenty of people wear artificial tails today and get laid …Do they? What did I miss? |
|
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [deleted] |