> Information leakage may also be occurring via PDF comments or orphaned objects inside compressed object streams, as I discovered above.

hopefully someone is independently archiving all documents

my understanding is that some are being removed

▲

agilob 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Reddit is also removing and shadowbannig such posts, but there's a community on https://lemmy.world/post/42440468

▲

some_random 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Are they being removed or replaced with more heavily redacted documents? There were definitely some victim names that slipped through the cracks that have since been redacted.

	▲	3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]

▲

embedding-shape 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Initially under "Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R.4405)" on https://www.justice.gov/epstein/doj-disclosures, all datasets had .zip links. I first saw that page when all but dataset 11 (or 10) had a .zip link. At one point this morning, all the .zip links were removed, now it seems like most are back again.

▲

littlecorner 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think some of the released documents included images of victims, which where redacted. So it's not necessarily malicious removals

▲

dylan604 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That's my understanding too, so archiving the unredacted images could mean holding CSAM.

	▲	streetfighter64 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Which is of course very convenient for the government, similar to when wikileaks got prosecuted for holding state secrets.

▲

thatguy0900 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If we're assuming they didn't leave victims unredacted on purpose