I think some of the released documents included images of victims, which where redacted. So it's not necessarily malicious removals

dylan604 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That's my understanding too, so archiving the unredacted images could mean holding CSAM.

	▲	streetfighter64 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Which is of course very convenient for the government, similar to when wikileaks got prosecuted for holding state secrets.

If we're assuming they didn't leave victims unredacted on purpose