(2025) just follow hn guideline, impressive voter ring though

5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

[deleted]

alain94040 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

We're in early February 2025 [edit:2026] and the article was written on Dec 23, 2025, which makes it less than two months old. I think it's ok not to include a year in the submission title in that case.

I personally understand a year in the submission as a warning that the article may not be up to date.

	▲	embedding-shape 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Less about the age, and more about confusing what they are analyzing, for the files that were just released like a week ago.
	▲	petepete 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		We're in Feb 2026. I'm not used to typing it yet, either.
	▲	GlitchRider47 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Generally, I'd agree with you. However, the recent Epstein file dump was in 2026, not 2025, so I would say it is relevant in this case..
	▲	michaelmcdonald 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		"We're in early February ~2025~ 2026"