| ▲ | alain94040 5 hours ago | |
We're in early February 2025 [edit:2026] and the article was written on Dec 23, 2025, which makes it less than two months old. I think it's ok not to include a year in the submission title in that case. I personally understand a year in the submission as a warning that the article may not be up to date. | ||
| ▲ | embedding-shape 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Less about the age, and more about confusing what they are analyzing, for the files that were just released like a week ago. | ||
| ▲ | petepete 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
We're in Feb 2026. I'm not used to typing it yet, either. | ||
| ▲ | GlitchRider47 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Generally, I'd agree with you. However, the recent Epstein file dump was in 2026, not 2025, so I would say it is relevant in this case.. | ||
| ▲ | michaelmcdonald 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
"We're in early February ~2025~ *2026*" | ||