| ▲ | chrisjj a day ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Are you from Sweden? No. I used this interweb thing to fetch that document from Sweden, saving me a 1000-mile walk. > Why do you think the definition was clear across the world and not changed "before AI"? I didn't say it was clear. I said there was no disagreement. And I said that because I saw only agreement. CSAM == child sexual abuse material == a record of child sexual abuse. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | lava_pidgeon a day ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
"No. I used this interweb thing to fetch that document from Sweden, saving me a 1000-mile walk." So you cant speak Swedish, yet you think you grasped the Swedish law definition? " I didn't say it was clear. I said there was no disagreement. " Sorry, there are lots of different judical definitions about CSAM in different countries, each with different edge cases and how to handle them. I very doubt it, there is a disaggrement. But my guess about your post is, that an American has to learn again there is a world outside of the US with different rules and different languages. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||