| ▲ | lava_pidgeon a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
"No. I used this interweb thing to fetch that document from Sweden, saving me a 1000-mile walk." So you cant speak Swedish, yet you think you grasped the Swedish law definition? " I didn't say it was clear. I said there was no disagreement. " Sorry, there are lots of different judical definitions about CSAM in different countries, each with different edge cases and how to handle them. I very doubt it, there is a disaggrement. But my guess about your post is, that an American has to learn again there is a world outside of the US with different rules and different languages. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | chrisjj a day ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> So you cant speak Swedish, yet you think you grasped the Swedish law definition? I guess you didn't read the doc. It is in English. I too doubt there's material disagreement between judicial definitions. The dubious definitions I'm referring to are the non-judicial fabrications behind accusations such as the root of this subthread. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||