Remix.run Logo
xyse53 12 hours ago

Yeah I'm more of a `--wet-run` `-w` fan myself. But it does depend on how serious/annoying the opposite is.

aqme28 12 hours ago | parent [-]

I've done that, but I hate the term "wet run."

I use "live run" now, which I think gets the point across without being sort of uncomfortable.

IgorPartola 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

--with-danger

--make-it-so

--do-the-thing

--go-nuts

--safety-off

So many fun options.

Darfk 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'm a fan of --safety-off. It gives off a 'aim away from face' or 'mishandle me and I'll blow a chunk out of your DB' vibe.

tetha 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I find it important to include system information in here as well, so just copy-pasting an invocation from system A to system B does not run.

For example, our database restore script has a parameter `--yes-delete-all-data-in` and it needs to be parametrized with the PostgreSQL cluster name. So a command with `--yes-delete-all-data-in=pg-accounting` works on exactly one system and not on other systems.

torstenvl 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's in the UI not the command line, but I like Chromium's thisisunsafe

JsonCameron 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I've done a few --execute --i-know-what-im-doing for some more dangerous scripts

altairprime 10 hours ago | parent [-]

May I recommend --I-take-responsibility-for-the-outcome-of-proceeding and require a capital I?

altairprime 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

--commit is solid too

bregma 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

    --moisten
Quekid5 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Moist run is the way.