Remix.run Logo
aqme28 13 hours ago

I've done that, but I hate the term "wet run."

I use "live run" now, which I think gets the point across without being sort of uncomfortable.

IgorPartola 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

--with-danger

--make-it-so

--do-the-thing

--go-nuts

--safety-off

So many fun options.

tetha 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I find it important to include system information in here as well, so just copy-pasting an invocation from system A to system B does not run.

For example, our database restore script has a parameter `--yes-delete-all-data-in` and it needs to be parametrized with the PostgreSQL cluster name. So a command with `--yes-delete-all-data-in=pg-accounting` works on exactly one system and not on other systems.

Darfk 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm a fan of --safety-off. It gives off a 'aim away from face' or 'mishandle me and I'll blow a chunk out of your DB' vibe.

torstenvl 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's in the UI not the command line, but I like Chromium's thisisunsafe

JsonCameron 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I've done a few --execute --i-know-what-im-doing for some more dangerous scripts

altairprime 11 hours ago | parent [-]

May I recommend --I-take-responsibility-for-the-outcome-of-proceeding and require a capital I?

altairprime 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

--commit is solid too

bregma 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

    --moisten
Quekid5 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Moist run is the way.