| ▲ | alexjplant 10 hours ago |
| Reddit has been a cesspit of recycled pablum, populist image macros and low effort reply comments for more than a decade. Enthusiast subreddits are astroturfed to hell and back by people with a Shopify storefront and a dream trying to growth hack their way to a hockey stick. The low barrier to entry to each community means that this vapid culture eventually diffuses itself across subreddits that might otherwise be good. It's a postmodern toilet that flushes into its own tank. I don't care if I sound old and salty when I say this: I miss phpBB and Invision forums. Even those are being bought up by marketing companies to sell ads and transformed with social media features... Xenforo (which everybody uses now) allows liking posts and supports Instagram-style content feeds. |
|
| ▲ | MatejKafka an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| True for the popular subreddits, but there are occasional niche communities that imo managed to keep the forum vibe (e.g., r/progmetal, r/cpp). |
|
| ▲ | ValentineC 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > I miss phpBB and Invision forums. As someone who's paid for an Invision Power Board licence before: I remember when they screwed all existing "lifetime/perpetual" licence holders with v3, and once again with v4. |
| |
|
| ▲ | SauntSolaire 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Agreed. I wish they would consider charging a small fee (~$1) to create an account. That alone would cut down on all the AI spam and give subreddit moderators a fighting chance. |
| |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > give subreddit moderators a fighting chance Moderators are part of the problem really, there are a handful of moderators holding the reins over all the popular subreddits, and "smaller" (even big ones) subreddits suffer from the same problem. As an example, r/MistralAI, r/LocalLLaMA, r/ChatGPT, r/OpenAI and r/grok are all run by the same person. The only survivable places on reddit left are the subreddits with small amount of contributors that aren't trying to gain something by participating and organizing. But they're so few. | | |
| ▲ | PaulDavisThe1st 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > But they're so few. Given how many subreddits there, I have to ask if you have statistics to back up this claim. My intuition is that people have problems with a bunch of popular subreddits, but the vast majority of subreddits are just fine. I have no statistics to back up this intuition. Do you? | | |
| ▲ | peyton 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | There’s a whole vibrant industry of people you can pay to market whatever you want on Reddit. They can’t all be competing for the same few popular subreddits. They must be differentiated by targeting niche subreddits. | | |
| ▲ | PaulDavisThe1st 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There's about 138,000 active subreddits. I don't believe that this industry is targetting even a majority of them. | |
| ▲ | GOD_Over_Djinn 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | nandomrumber 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Imagine coming to a place where the written rules ask us for to be intellectually curious and to reply to the strongest interpretation of others. Then pulling down your pants in the living room and taking a shit on the floor. At least try not to be a cunt, mate. | |
| ▲ | PaulDavisThe1st 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Tell me more ... what's so naive? | | |
| ▲ | jibal 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Looking at their other comments (e.g., "h1b invasion" and lots of misinformation about COVID) it's probably not in your interest to engage with them. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | miki123211 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There are two problems in computer science, accepting payments and naming things. Reddit's principal problem is that the first person to take r/foo is often a BDFL for foo for life, and no other subreddit about foo will ever be quite as recognizable. If we instead had subreddits with a numeric ID and a non-unique display name, that problem would be solved. Payments would also solve the spam problem, but many users who have $1 can't easily get that $1 to Reddit, so that's not really an option either. | | |
| ▲ | direwolf20 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Reddit is eager to remove mods who it disagrees with. Any remaining mods are there because Reddit approves of them. |
| |
| ▲ | direwolf20 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Admins actively choose moderators, removing ones they don't like and inserting their favorites. Recently, a mod was removed from r/LivestreamFails and made a public crashout video. In exactly the way you'd expect a Reddit mod to. | |
| ▲ | Manuel_D 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Reddit recently announced a change that capped the number of large subreddits than any individual can moderate. It might reduce this problem. | | | |
| ▲ | VorpalWay 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I don't necessarily agree, the Rust subreddit is fine (except for all the AI slop posts this year, which the moderators have a hard time keeping up with) and some of the more niche 3D printing subreddits are doing fine, basically it feels like the past few years haven't happened there. The Arch Linux subreddit is a bit chaotic, but the moderation is not really the problem I think. Maybe all of these fall into your last paragraph and I simply don't frequent the type of subreddit you describe. The thing is, it is hard to tell if it is you or me who have a representative sample here, or if we are both off. Two samples is not statistically significant. | | |
| ▲ | jibal 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | There are over 100,000 subreddits and the vast majority of them (and all of the ones I follow) fall into their last paragraph ... it's not at all "so few". And even if it were, "representative sample" isn't really relevant when you can select and mute subs ... it's really not much different from usenet, which I was very active on in the 80's and 90's. |
| |
| ▲ | Bender 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Here's one of 'em [1] [1] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E36G9QOolxk [video][12 mins] |
| |
| ▲ | shevy-java 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | But one problem on reddit were the mods. It was why I retired. Bots and AI spam can be annoying but mods that lock you out of discussions are much worse. | |
| ▲ | alisonatwork 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | $1 is far too low to discourage abuse. Spammers and scammers will still make exponential returns. PR agencies are paid tens of thousands to craft narratives for their clients. With institutional actors the sky is the limit. Even just your average basement dwelling troll might consider it worth their while to pay a dollar for a sock puppet account. | | |
| ▲ | rchaud 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Requiring a valid payment method before posting will take out 99.9% of spammers and trolls. Newspapers discovered this when they went behind paywalls. SomethingAwful discovered this 20 years ago when they required $10 to create an account. |
| |
| ▲ | slumberlust 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Reddit could pay the mods. Let us not act like spam accounts are undesirable for the lil piggy. MAU doesn't differentiate between real and fake users. | |
| ▲ | leptons an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Lol, I guess I'm glad I checked-out from reddit before the whole "AI" thing took off. My life is honestly way better without reddit. HN isn't far behind though, honestly. The less time I spend here, the better for everything else going on in my life. HN has at least been somewhat useful for my day-job and employment future. | |
| ▲ | crooked-v 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Something Awful has retained a weirdly high level of quality these days by (still) charging :tenbux: to register an account. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | GeoAtreides 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| >Xenforo (which everybody uses now) allows liking posts and supports Instagram-style content feeds. On spacebattles you get infracted for chan-like (or instagram-like) behaviour. It's all about how strict moderation is. They do allow likes (but there's no algo) |
| |
| ▲ | sarchertech 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Oh man spacebattles is still active? I haven’t been there regularly in 20 years. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | shevy-java 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| phpBB was quite nice, but you must remember that people used phpBB less and less over the years. Many phpBB style webforums are dead, and died before discourse etc... came about. People's habits changed. I do agree that things got worse in the last ~16 years or so. |
| |
| ▲ | marginalia_nu 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | What really killed phpBB and that generation of boards was mostly the sketchy codebases they ran off. The code was rife with vulnerabilities, so the boards needed constant patching (which was a non-trivial that sometimes killed the database). If you didn't patch on time, a script inevitably dropped by, exploited the software, dumped all credentials, and nuked the database. Those old forums were not built with the adversarial nature of the 2010s internet in mind. Boards were dropping like flies a few years there. Most simply never recovered. | | |
| ▲ | Bender 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Absolutely avoid all the extensions. Supposedly that got tightened up in v3.x but I saw some boards get pwned in 2.x from the extensions. Another issue is that most people were too lazy to harden php.ini yup this is a thing and their servers allowed outbound connections so exploiting some of the core code was much easier. Maybe I am just lucky but I never had a security issue with phpBB. One of my earliest forums using phpBB had over 50k people on it. That may not sound like much but it was a niche community and very early in the Internets existence. |
| |
| ▲ | Arainach 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The legal landscape has also changed. 20 years ago I helped run a web forum, but with today's legal landscape - DMCA in the US, various different laws in the EU and other countries - I would never do so. The amount of liability on the host for user-created content is far too high. | | |
| ▲ | Bender 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The legal landscape has also changed. It did change a lot but the biggest changes were the ToS/AuP of server/VM providers. What was not even taboo in the early 00's was becoming a problem keeping an account active on clear-web sites. Across the board many providers starting using the vague word "lewd" a word I had never heard of even after running porn sites for a long time. Many of us moved to .onion despite being incredibly slow at the time. We would keep an unpublished clear-web sub-domain active for the old time users so they had a fast connection. Eventually that was even problematic so many forum operators stopped accepting new users and made their forums private or semi-private. Some still exist and some got married, had kids and real life took too much time and energy to also run such sites. | |
| ▲ | direwolf20 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You are shielded from liability if you respond to abuse reports. | |
| ▲ | int_19h 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | DMCA was already a thing 20 years ago? | | |
| |
| ▲ | zdragnar 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There's one or two still kicking around that I visit myself, but I'll admit I don't miss not having threaded conversations. Trying to follow a conversation with other people butting in with low effort shit posting is way harder with everything being linear. | | |
| ▲ | nandomrumber 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | We can’t have threaded conversations because that would elevate some users and subordinate other’s comments. Everyone is equal and hierarchy is bad. |
| |
| ▲ | Bender 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I still use it for private and semi-private forums. The access controls make it much easier to stop drive-by spammers or at very least prevent anyone seeing their crap posts. | |
| ▲ | PaulDavisThe1st 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What, really, is the difference between phpBB and discourse (not discord) in the context of the discussion we're having here? | | |
| ▲ | Bender 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | For phpBB site behavior, access control lists, ranks unless discourse has added that, per board policies, per rank policies. I have not used Discourse in a long time so I have no idea what they have added but that was the difference long ago. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | insane_dreamer 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I miss slashdot 20 years ago :/ |
| |
| ▲ | stateofinquiry an hour ago | parent [-] | | I still visit regularly (and have since about 2000 or so), but I agree that it is not the same as in those days. I remember feeling like I was gaining actual insight into the topics from the comments, today... much less so. Maybe being older also plays a role, but I think /. has certainly changed as well. |
|
|
| ▲ | AlienRobot 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The craziest thing about Reddit for me is how most communities forbid "self-promotion." To me that sounds like a thing only admins would want because it keeps users on the site/app, but this is enforced by moderators for some reason and a lot of drama has occurred over banning creators over these silly rules. It's a place that originally was a link-sharing platform, where you literally can't share a link to your own website on any subreddit. At least not if you are honest about it. It's okay if you pretend you aren't associated to it. Reddit has become essentially watermarked videos posted by people pretending they aren't the creator of the video, twitter screenshots with 10 likes posted by people pretending they aren't the user who tweeted the tweet, and links to news websites posted by users whose only activity on reddit seems to be posting the same link to 5 different subreddits as if it was their job, because it probably is. |
| |
| ▲ | CuriouslyC 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I'm not a good marketer, so take what I say with a grain of salt, but the only thing I've found that works is replying to relevant comments in popular threads with neutral looking promotional material (e.g. github links). A well placed reply in a hot thread will easily drive 10x the value of a blog post. |
|
|
| ▲ | whatshisface 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| After a certain point, these threads start sounding like, "I hate my rights. I hate the town square. There is litter in the common square. There is a child outdoors. Take away my pubic square." |
| |
| ▲ | 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | Aeglaecia 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I think it sounds more like "why is the town square covered in ads now , who installed actual mantraps in the town square , why is everything we do in the town square used against us , town squares were fine less than two decades ago and we let the rich parasitize them for profit" | | |
| ▲ | heavyset_go 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Except you're doing nothing about that besides going "let's keep the town square terrible" and ensuring kids are 100% unprepared for the way the modern world communicates in the 21st century lol | | |
| ▲ | spaqin 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Exchanging messages with your contacts isn't really that hard that you really need to prepare for it. | | |
| ▲ | heavyset_go 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Zealous parents are using this as an opportunity to take phones, computers and means of digital communication away. Hell, by law, you can't even use Discord without verifying your age lol Imagine if they banned video games and texting 20 years ago because parents were convinced their kids were addicted to Halo and T9Word. They could always roll hoops in the street and send letters to each other with a little planning, too. |
| |
| ▲ | collingreen 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Which part is "keep the town square terrible"? | | |
| ▲ | heavyset_go 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | The part where social media goes completely unchanged except for banning some kids from communicating with their friends | | |
| ▲ | yallpendantools 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Which just begs the question, how much can you really change social media? How much are you really in control of your feed? This is where the "pubic square" analogy breaks down. Besides, there are a lot of communication mediums/messaging apps that are not social media. Even back in the early 2010s I've been trying to consume social media mindfully. I made sure to follow pages with meaningful content (e.g., The Dalai Lama, The Long Now Foundation, Aeon Magazine, tech-related pages, SpaceX, Elon Musk, indie creators). I don't just add or follow blindly. Back then I could justify why my selection was "good" but even then, they were drowned out by the tedium of vacations, new restaurants, felt-cute-might-delete-later selfies. Slop/engagement bait is quicker to produce than meaningful thought-provoking content. I am also pretty sure Facebook's negative signals (unfollow, don't show me this type of content) did not work back then, at least not deterministically. If something I did not like had enough traction, it will still pop up in my feed. And of course, goes without saying that a lot of my choices aged like milk. Elon Musk turned out to be, well, Elon Musk. Some of the tech pages started shilling out crypto (and nowadays doubtless AI). The indie creators either stopped posting or fell out of favor with the algorithm which meant exodus from the platform. All that goes on top of my pre-existing grievances against my feed recommendations. | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [deleted] |