Remix.run Logo
wateralien 8 hours ago

Top of HN and people are loving it, but there's got to be a better way of getting some $$ rewards for fun viral ideas like this than "Buy me a coffee". I'm betting he's got tens of thousands of sessions currently and nobody is tipping. https://ko-fi.com/magnushambleton

Is there a better way? Asking for myself, also.

pibaker 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This will be an unpopular answer but one way that could have worked is just good ol' advertising, because it directly converts "virality" into income.

Any solution that requires the user to bust out a credit card and put down his billing address has way too much friction for the median user to get through.

cyode 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I see 16 coffees received. Assuming no private donations for simplicity, that’s $48. As an ads noob, how many sessions would a banner ad need to beat that?

jokethrowaway 5 hours ago | parent [-]

My CPM is not great (not Google) and that's 25-30k impressions

7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
wateralien 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Unfortunately true.

Timwi 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Is there a better way?

Yes, UBI. Then you can create what you want and your livelihood doesn't depend on it going viral.

pfannkuchen 2 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

How do we ensure that we don’t enter the failure mode of “not enough necessities get made”?

Like it seems like people are ideologically for or against UBI, but I’ve never seen anyone discuss how the mechanism would avoid this outcome. Like I’m not saying it’s 100% the outcome that would happen on whatever time frame, just that even e.g. a 10% chance of that happening would make it too risky to attempt at scale. And like I don’t accept “some people just love farming” or “a lot of stuff that isn’t needed gets made now”, I need an actual mechanism description.

OCASMv2 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Nah, that just turns people into slaves of whoever is signing the checks.

thrance 38 minutes ago | parent [-]

Unlike now?

wavemode 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Most people want a lot more out of life than basic necessities.

Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

UBI does not mean you don't work, nor you can't earn a lot of money. It just means we don't let you starve if you don't work and we stop making you work out of fear of leaving you starve if you don't.

I'm a psychiatry resident and developper. I have never been paid for my dev work but have produced quite a lot on my free time (site: w.olicorne.org ). I would do psychiatry pretty much no matter how much I'm paid for it.

In my view the most productive people of every field are not incentivized by money and would do it anyway. UBI would free up time and cognitive load of the most productive people I believe. Following a 80/20 kinda rule.

Hence UBI here would mean that the dev would not *have to* monetize.

jonahx 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> In my view the most productive people of every field are not incentivized by money and would do it anyway.

The idea that money is not an effective incentive to drive behavior is wishful thinking. Even just among devs, even just among devs who truly love programming, most would be doing very different work, and working for different organizations (or none at all) if money weren't the driver.

> Hence UBI here would mean that the dev would not have to monetize.

Ok, but the dev might still want to monetize, and we're back to the original question.

laserlight a minute ago | parent [-]

> Ok, but the dev might still want to monetize, and we're back to the original question.

It's alright. Those who would like to monetize can. There are others who wouldn't and UBI would utilize that surplus talent, which otherwise had to perform tasks they weren't skilled at to earn a living.

TechSquidTV 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

But they want to was the point.

djeastm 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Indeed. Some of us want basic necessities provided to everyone.

fragmede 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

what does UBI have to do with getting paid for making cool shit?

thunderfork 4 hours ago | parent [-]

You can make cool shit without having to do the work of productizing and monetizing it

airstrike 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, and a magic fairy creates the economic value that funds the UBI

Nextgrid an hour ago | parent [-]

Every company and their dog is saying that LLMs/"AI" is supposed to be that magic fairy anytime now.

Lerc 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There have been alternatives suggested. While better is a subjective term, most alternatives have either not been successful or have not yet meaningfully achieved a level of success to matter.

Flattr took one approach without much success. They represented the problem well though. When someone does something that is of a small but not insignificant benefit for a large number of people, how should they be rewarded? When the reward due, divided by the number of people paying for it, gets low enough it seems to not reach a threshold that it makes sense for any individual to pay.

You could charge a fee above the threshold, and many people do take this path. It is essentially requiring a small number of people to massively overpay to cover those who don't pay at all.

A Universal Income takes the approach that if everyone gets what they need there is no particular requirement to be monetarily rewarded. You essentially have been rewarded for whatever it is you do.

Advertising plays the small threshold thing both ways, They offer you a chance to sell a little corruption below your threshold for thinking it is damaging, and in return they accumulate the corruption and the money and send you the money and deliver the requested corruption to their customers.

Part of the fundamental difficulty is in determining the size of the reward due. How is that determined? There are plenty of people who will offer services to do that if it means they can take a cut. I don't see that path going well unless it is a mechanism governed by strict non-profit rules, and even then I would have doubts.

A purely rule based system would be intrinsically unfair and subject to gaming, but often times this turns out to be the least worst solution. By agreeing to a set of rules people can accept that while flawed, adhering to them by agreement can make a system that cannot be taken over by a malicious individual.

In short, right now, No I don't think there is a better way. There may be people with a financial interest that it remains that way.

mncharity 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Is there a better way?

If one's visitors are gamers, perhaps one might use gaming payment providers to sell an "supporter badge"? But that's perhaps be pushing their envelope.

If one's visitors are from the "rapidly-developing world", with well-adopted candybar-scale micropayment systems - China, India, Indonesia, Brasil, Kenya, SK, Sweden... hmm. Direct access from elsewhere seems still very limited, but perhaps one might use a global payment gateway like Adyen? My impression is transaction cost is more than $0.10 but less than $1.

In the "less-rapidly-developing world", X.com has been working towards a similar superapp with Visa for the US. The Visa/MC duopoly seems to have shifted from its years of preventing US micropayments, to something like "maybe 2030-ish".

huehehue 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I built a browser extension for a hackathon that enabled crypto payments direct to site owners. "registration" was just sticking a formatted payment address in a DNS TXT record, and if you were at a supported website, the extension would light up, and facilitated payment.

I still think it's a neat idea but I can't be bothered to build a real version

Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I had a similar idea for a library used to collect how much you owe who:

https://github.com/thiswillbeyourgithub/FUTOmeter

smoovb 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You'd love Brave browser then.

Levitating 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Ideally the model would be run locally in the browser, so the author isn't paying whatever they're paying. But the web standards to do complicated stuff locally aren't there yet and probably will never be.

That's not a practical answer but it's my two cents.

wateralien 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I wish I could give him two cents without having to try. HTTP status 402 with micropayments or something needs to become a thing. The platforms do it... (subs, tips, donations, rewards etc etc.) Why can't the web.

Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I had an idea for a library used to collect how much you owe who:

https://github.com/thiswillbeyourgithub/FUTOmeter

IshKebab 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

All you need is WASM surely? I expect this model is too big to download & run on local CPUs though.

glaucon 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My view may be as realistic as these architectural drawings but I've long thought that some sort of micro payment system would address a lot of problems, many more significant than tipping software developers.

smoovb 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Youtube has this model with Preimum. If Chrome rolled out Chrome Premium, (and copied the Brave BAT model of paying sites you give attention to), I'd be happy to pay.

Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I had an idea for a library used to collect how much you owe who:

https://github.com/thiswillbeyourgithub/FUTOmeter

falloutx 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Guy who posted this is actually a VC (not sure how big).

AceJohnny2 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Thanks for the highlight. Doesn't seem like there's much activity on his Ko-Fi for being on the front page of HN. I sent him a tip, although privately.

Fuzzwah 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It should be tasteful ads for the AI companies that are making money... Oh wait, I instantly see the problem with that idea.