| ▲ | retired 5 hours ago |
| Is it possible to use a media converter from glass fiber to RJ45/Ethernet? Those are commonly available and then you can use whatever modem/router you like. |
|
| ▲ | vladvasiliu 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I don't know if it's the case in Germany, but here in France consumer FTTH networks are of the GPON persuasion. These need to handle encryption and be able to properly register on the tree, so I'm not completely shocked they require some form of ISP-provided device to terminate the fiber connection. There's also a EU law which says that users should be able to bring their own modems / routers, so AFAIK providers say that this particular terminal device is still "on their side of the network". I've seen such devices come in two varieties. One is a separate device which plugs on the optical network, does the encryption and stuff, and then exposes an ethernet port which is connected to the actual router which does wifi, etc. With SFR and Bouygues, it was trivial [0] to replace the ISP-provided router with one of your choosing. You get the normal external IPs and you do your thing. The ISP router sleeps in its box in storage. This was my setup up until a few years ago, with both these providers. Now SFR has moved to CGNAT, but the setup is the same, so I expect users to still be able to switch routers (but I haven't tested, since I'm not a client anymore). Then there's Free, who provides a single device that connects to the fiber, does routing, wifi, etc. In this case, it's possible to flip a switch in its settings for it to act as a bridge (don't know how wifi behaves in this case, if it stays on). It then only accepts a single downstream client, which gets the external IP. SFR had a similar setup for DOCSIS. I'm not familiar with how Orange, the biggest operator, functions. But I understand they have a general tendency to be a PITA so YMMV with them. --- [0] For Bouygues, this device only talked on a tagged VLAN100 for some reason. On the SFR, the network expected you to send a client id in the DHCP request. |
| |
| ▲ | B1FIDO 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The term you're looking for is "demarc" or: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demarcation_point This is the physical boundary of a network, in telecommunications. This is the junction where the service provider can point and say "that's our equipment on this side". So it helps to narrow down the troubleshooting. Often, if you have a telephone landline, you will see your demarc take the form of a gray RJ11 box with a small self-plug in it. It would be common practice to plug a phone into that box directly, then you've eliminated the "inside wiring" in the house. | |
| ▲ | DannyBee 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The 8311 discord is a great source of technical info and help on using your own PON equipment of various sorts with providers | | |
| ▲ | vladvasiliu an hour ago | parent [-] | | I've seen things about this, but I'm not convinced there's enough value in going to great lengths to replace that particular piece of equipment. In the case where the terminating equipment is a small box that exposes ethernet, with no routing or otherwise interfering the function of my own router, I think it's good enough. An argument could be made for the all-in-one devices, like saving some power. I get the geek factor, and it's one of the reasons why I run my own router, but for this specific bit, which needs to be fairly well integrated with the ISP's network, combined with their usual abysmal support, I think it's a better bet to just leave it alone. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | nandomrumber 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You’d need to be able to replicate whatever configuration the ISP provided device has, and they won’t give you that. FTTH here in Australia is the same, you’re stuck using the network providers device, which just provides an Ethernet port, and a POTS port if you’re in to that sort of thing, with your LAN device connected behind it. There was fierce lobbying back in the day (shout out to Simon Hackett / Internode) for our national broadband network to be simple dark fibre and that ISPs could build on top of that to provide innovation and differentiation. Instead what we got was a bunch of ISPs that resell the National Broadband Network’s expensive wholesale plans with little in the way of either differentiation or innovation. Edit to add: what the sibling comments said too. |
| |
| ▲ | Youden 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | FWIW, the incumbent ISP in Switzerland, Swisscom, tried to roll out XGS-PON but our "Internode", Init7, fought them in court on the grounds that it was anticompetitive, since it locks every provider into a single technology. They won. Now customers can choose. Nearly every ISP chooses the easy way and has the customer connect through Swisscom's XGS-PON but Init7 in particular has instead built out their own routers in POPs around Switzerland so that customers can have a physical fibre directly to their network. It's just plain ethernet with DHCP so you can use whatever equipment you want. It's also allowed Init7 to do something none of the other providers can do: offer 25Gbps symmetric service at no extra cost (beyond a one-off installation cost for the more expensive SFP modules). | |
| ▲ | retired 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Thanks. I have an ISP provided media converter with my own router behind that, using the correct VLAN was enough to get it working. I thought those media converters were pretty dumb devices but it seems they are not. | | |
| ▲ | DannyBee an hour ago | parent [-] | | They are not dumb but are very standardized. Unless they are issuing and verifying device certs you can almost certainly use your own PON equipment with very little effort. If they are using certs youd have to extract it. The vast majority of ISPs don't bother or care. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | DannyBee 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yes, with right kind of PON SFP stick this is possible. Most kinds of PON sticks are still in the $150-300 range though for XGS-PON (I use an XGS-PON stick with AT&T instead of their modem) |
|
| ▲ | progbits 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| They most likely use GPON so the optic is going to see return traffic for your neighbors. So they make it hard (but not impossible) to bring your own optic or media converter. |
| |
| ▲ | vladvasiliu 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | AFAIK GPON uses encryption, so you actually get the traffic intended for all your neighbors but can't do anything with it. If you bring your own converter, you wouldn't be able to handle your own traffic either. | | | |
| ▲ | zhouzhao 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You can bring your own modem. You just have to register it. | | |
| ▲ | madduci 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | But how? There is no information about it, which means, it can't be done without any form of reverse engineering |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Namidairo 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| If I recall, for something like GPON or XGS-PON, you end up having to clone the various attributes of the original for it to work properly. This typically includes serial number, hardware id, firmware identifiers, etc. |
| |
| ▲ | DannyBee an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | For most it is just serial number. The 8311 folks have scripts that will fully automate the cloning for most common devices. This is not like a "break open your hardware and attach wires" type thing. There are some ISPs issuing and verifying certs for GPON, which are more annoying to extract. I'm not aware of anyone (even those same ISPs) doing it for XGS-PON. It seems they all decided maintainimg their own CA infrastructure for millions of customers was not worth it ;) | |
| ▲ | retired 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Question out of curiosity. I once swapped a TPLink media converter between two homes, both using the same ISP, to debug internet issues and to see if that would improve the situation. Did I do something incredibly illegal? And did my ISP get confused seeing my media converter on the other side of town? | | |
| ▲ | direwolf20 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This wouldn't be criminally illegal anywhere unless done with some sort of fraudulent intent, but maybe in some places the ISP could make you swap them back. | |
| ▲ | fc417fc802 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Illegal? No, at least not in any sane jurisdiction. It's no different than moving a SIM card between phones. Confused? Maybe but probably not. It depends on how they track things. An ISP I had in the past tagged subscriber accounts on the OLT side. |
|
|