| ▲ | There's only one Woz, but we can all learn from him(fastcompany.com) |
| 188 points by coloneltcb 5 days ago | 79 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | Peroni 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I once approached Woz about potentially speaking at Hacker News London, fully expecting my email to be completely ignored. A few days later, he actually responded enthusiastically and mentioned an upcoming trip to the UK. He loved the grassroots nature of the meetup and was really up for giving a talk (for free!) to the community. I then had multiple delightful interactions with his wife who managed his logistics. Devastatingly he fell ill just before his trip and had to withdraw. Fortunately we hadn't announced anything however I still mourn over the missed opportunity to be able to introduce this living legend to our audience! |
| |
| ▲ | simonh 13 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I didn't know there is a HN meetup in LDN. How do I join up? | | |
| ▲ | Peroni 8 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Unfortunately we shut it down when COVID hit. I think there's a smaller, less formal HN meetup still happening occasionally but I'm not affiliated with it. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | bigstrat2003 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Woz is by far the person in computing history for whom I have the most respect. Dude is an absolute legend, and from everything I have heard is humble and kind on top of his crazy skills. If I could get to the point where I had even 10% of his skill and generosity of spirit, I would consider myself to have done pretty well. |
| |
| ▲ | mghackerlady 5 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | To me he's second only to stallman for me. Woz is an engineering genius, but stallman is pretty much the reason we're on this site right now in a way | |
| ▲ | postalcoder 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I can't think of a single person who embodies the spirit of this site more than Woz. dang could replace the guidelines with a picture of Woz and we'd all know what it meant. | | |
| ▲ | omnimus 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Let's not forget url of this site is Ycombinator. As far as i know that is very far from “friendly selfless genius inventor engineer”. It's more like “ambitious finance move fast and break things programmer”. | | |
| ▲ | SkyMarshal 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | To be fair, Woz wasn't just a “friendly selfless genius inventor engineer”, he was also the co-founder of one of the most valuable tech companies in the world. And YC is, in their own words: "The Y combinator is one of the coolest ideas in computer science. It's also a metaphor for what we do. It's a program that runs programs; we're a company that helps start companies.". They're not entirely unrelated. | | |
| ▲ | al_borland 19 minutes ago | parent [-] | | He was a cofounder because of his skill and Jobs talking him into it. Woz would have been perfectly happy as an engineer at HP, that was his plan. |
| |
| ▲ | chairmansteve an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You are right. But the real world is a messy place. Good people do bad things and vice versa. Not many people are entirely good or entirely bad. HN is a very strong net positive IMO. YC could easily monetize it into oblivion. They don't. | |
| ▲ | postalcoder 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Woz is a primary figure in one of YC’s essential texts. He has always been revered here as a founder and as a human. https://www.amazon.com/Founders-Work-Stories-Startups-Early/... | |
| ▲ | flomo 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | "Tech Cofounder" who gets edged out before the next funding round. |
| |
| ▲ | aembleton 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Maybe Fabrice Bellard could be a candidate. | | |
| ▲ | jdefr89 17 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Obviously familiar with Fabrice Bellard and his technical contributions but it seems like he is a pretty private person and he keeps to himself. I don't really know much about him as a person. |
| |
| ▲ | direwolf20 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Woz may embody the spirit of hacking but does he really embody the spirit of venture capital? | | |
| ▲ | postalcoder 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Since when was HN about venture capital? Hacker news is designed for and targeted at hackers. In the sense of the word that means people who write code, not people who break into things. Other people with similar tastes also like it.
Since it's run by YC and the initial users were mostly YC founders, there is inevitably a startup spin to the stories that are popular here. In fact the site was originally called Startup News. But it turned out to be boring to have so much of a startup focus, so we changed the name and the focus to be more general.
- pg (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1648199)Also: https://web.archive.org/web/20070624055731/http://www.founde... | | |
| ▲ | paulcole 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Do you believe all marketing and advertising copy that you read? | | |
| ▲ | postalcoder 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Look at the questions I'm replying to. They, in one way or another, asked me to draw a line between Woz and Ycombinator. That's what I did. Woz has always carried a near perfect approval rate in our community. I've never seen anyone come close. | | |
| ▲ | paulcole 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Sorry, I was replying to the person who said, “Since when was HN about venture capital?” The answer to that is obviously since its inception. It’s like watching those weird flying contraption contests and asking, “Since when is Red Bull about energy drinks?” | | |
| ▲ | postalcoder 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Oh wait that was me. I mean, yes you're right that vc and startups are inextricable. But I’d argue their underlying spirit isn’t the same. I realize that’s a normative claim. Like the blind men and the elephant, we’re each touching a different part. | | |
| ▲ | paulcole 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > But I’d argue their underlying spirit isn’t the same. And your argument is based on the fact that you’d like this to be true as well as the fact that the vc company behind this site said, “Trust us bro!” How is that different from the cow saying, “The farmer told us we’re walking through a fun maze!” | | |
| ▲ | postalcoder an hour ago | parent [-] | | I may have overthought this and wandered into territory I don’t actually have strong convictions about. My original impulse was simply to show some love for Woz. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | ares623 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Everyone chooses the wrong Steve to worship. | | |
| ▲ | Aloha 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | If you're an engineer, you should admire Woz, if you're a product manager or marketeer, Jobs. Jobs was a brilliant product manager and marketeer - every bit as brilliant as Woz is an engineer. The truth is, the sharpest engineers struggle to make a marketable consumer product - because they make it for themselves, and while thats quite laudable, however it's generally a tiny market compared to one targeted at normal people. | | |
| ▲ | p00dles 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | They were both brilliant, but from everything that I've read, Jobs was an ass****, and Woz was the opposite, and that is a huge, huge difference. The mythologizing of Jobs is the canonical example of people condoning terrible behavior because they think that a person is smart/valuable/talented/etc. To me this is completely backwards and sets a terrible precedent - that you can act however you want if you get results - especially given how many people idolize and look up to Jobs. | | |
| ▲ | hyperhello 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Jobs dealt with people and respected the machines. Woz dealt with machines and respected the people. | | |
| ▲ | hobs 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Jobs fucked over a lot of people and respected the machines. Woz dealt with the machines and respected the people. |
| |
| ▲ | microtherion 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The other huge, huge difference is that one of the Steves has demonstrated he was able to build a successful product without the other's assistance. | | |
| ▲ | fuzzfactor 29 minutes ago | parent [-] | | You could say that about the iPod or the iPhone which Woz wasn't involved in, but when you do the math, there's only one Woz and he was essential to define the company in the 20th century, and look how many people it took to "replace" him when it came to Jobs "alone" defining the company in the 21st century. |
| |
| ▲ | lynx97 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | And still, when it comes to built-in accessibility, Jobs is pretty much famous for his "fuck ROI" statement. He set precedence around 2007, which eventually forced other players like Google and Microsoft to follow. These days, Talkback and Narrator are builtin for both OSes, which is mostly because Apple went there first. This move changed the lifes of a a few million people. | |
| ▲ | tbossanova 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You need both though. You have to accept there are a certain amount of psychopaths in the world, and learn how to manage them |
| |
| ▲ | BirAdam 38 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This. When Woz created the Apple I and Apple II, the entire microcomputer market consisted of hackers, tinkerers, enthusiasts, and hobbyists. Had Woz been acting alone, the Apple I and Apple II would have made a splash at Homebrew, but they wouldn't have been products. Jobs made them products. After VisiCalc, this market expanded to finance professionals, but it was still a tiny market. It was really Raskin and Jobs who proved the viability of the Xerox PARC (and SRI before them) advancements around the GUI that propelled computing to a more general audience. Then, MS caught up, dominated the market in the 1990s, and Apple came back only when Jobs returned and began pushing industrial design and OS X. From the point until quite recently, most companies R&D could have just been attending Apple product launches and imitating as best they could (that's hyperbolic, but not entirely incorrect). | |
| ▲ | Findecanor 19 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I have chosen to go by "Take no heroes, only inspiration", and take different inspiration from both. | |
| ▲ | nekooooo 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | true. woz made a $900 universal remote in 1987.
it could control 256 devices via IR and was programmable via PC at a time when you probably had 1 device in your house (with 7 channels.) Maybe 2 if you had a tape player. He clearly made it for himself and his sick component system. | |
| ▲ | keiferski 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I admire both and I find the push to Pick a Steve Team really irritating. | | |
| ▲ | fragmede 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Both, the sum is greater than the parts. Neither of them would be there without the other. | | |
| ▲ | fuzzfactor 42 minutes ago | parent [-] | | When you look at it squarely, Jobs could have sold any average product and made money, and Woz' product was so far above average it could have sold on its own (to a more limited extent), with each unit sold making money either way. Money would be made by each person regardless but this combination not only got more units to fly off the shelf, it got the company off to a more above-average likelihood of future products doing well with growth from there. The longer that structure can be maintained, the better. Most of the time a miraculous salesman or marketing strategist has an average to below-average product to represent, and they will still do very well. So well in fact, that they themselves may never find out what the full upside would be if they had a product that actually was above-average enough for it to be able to sell on its own one way or another. And then act as a multiplier to that. Through the roof can be hard to avoid then. Same business plan I had as a preteen, way before Apple got going. | | |
| ▲ | al_borland 6 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Woz took the Apple 1 to HP to see if they wanted it, since he was working there at the time. They passed on it. It seems Woz would have just kept working as an HP engineer and bringing designs to the homebrew computer club to give them away as a hobby. Jobs went on to start NeXT (which became modern Apple) and turned Pixar into a the studio that released Toy Story. Jobs wasn’t just a salesman, he was a serial entrepreneur. His footnotes would be most people’s whole career. His talent wasn’t just sales, but also building teams of talented people and selling them on his vision. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | bko 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Worshiping Woz is cool, but like the article says, there's only one Woz. And chances are you're nothing like Woz or Jobs. But Ballmer? That's someone I can look to emulate. https://medium.com/packt-hub/how-to-be-like-steve-ballmer-cf... | | |
| ▲ | varjag 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | There were/are countless engineers which are very like Woz. Just that engineers are worse positioned to reap the rewards of commercial success so you rarely hear of them. |
| |
| ▲ | tehnub 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I worship both thank you very much. |
| |
| ▲ | appplication 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I was behind Woz in Heathrow security a few years back. I was taken aback he’d just be in the regular airport security line given he’s probably worth 1B+. I asked him if he was who I thought he was (he was wearing a face mask, but it was printed with a picture of his own face on it so I wasn’t sure). He said yes and asked if I wanted to take a selfie. Very humble dude. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | doanbactam 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It’s a stark contrast to today's mindset where we often just throw more resources at the problem. His obsession with elegance over features is something I try to keep in mind, even if it's harder in modern web dev. " Let's make it shorter and punchier. "Woz's floppy disk controller design is still the gold standard for doing in software what competitors needed a whole board of chips to do. That kind of obsession with elegance over brute force is exactly what's missing in modern engineering. |
| |
| ▲ | nekooooo 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | modern engineering is launching an electron to-do list app that uses 2gb of ram. | | |
| ▲ | high_na_euv 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Which, at least works relibly across all platforms and devices unlike desktop frameworks? People wouldnt use electron is they had good alternative | | |
| ▲ | quietbritishjim 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Flutter / Dart? It's compiled ahead of time and doesn't use an embedded browser so I'd expect it to be a lot lighter, though I haven't measured. But the general lack of really cross-platform (desktop + mobile + maybe web) ecosystems is just as much as sign that devs consider multi-gigabyte Electron apps "good enough" as the apps themselves. | | |
| ▲ | pixl97 an hour ago | parent [-] | | >at devs consider multi-gigabyte Electron apps "good enough" as the apps themselves. This kind of misses out on a hierarchy of devs here and the amount of work to make it happen. Electron took a large chunk from a multi-billion dollar endeavor to use to make all this work. Electron only worked because Chrome was there. Chrome worked because Google already had unlimited money from advertising, and getting advertising on every device possible was their goal. Devs might want light apps everywhere, but seemingly none are going to dedicate the rest of their life and money to make it work. |
| |
| ▲ | steve1977 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Reliable as in "exposes the same bug across all platforms"? | |
| ▲ | lynx97 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If you are willing to ignore accessibility, your statement is right. |
| |
| ▲ | aix1 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | What I'm seeing more and more of is junior folks blindly taking LLM-generated code and including it into their systems, without even trying to understand it or think critically about what it does and where it might break. Maybe I am living in the past, but it does make me think that they might be depriving themselves of an opportunity to develop key skills. | | |
| ▲ | pixl97 an hour ago | parent [-] | | >without even trying to understand it or think critically about what it does and where it might break. You are living in a past, but one much farther back than you expect. People were copying code from SO since it became popular. People are including node modules blindly before AI. Most developers suck, terribly. Maybe being on HN is a type of filter that shows you're just a little bit better than the average, but the number of developers on HN is small versus the total number of developers. Edit: I was copying code out of magazines to get games running without understanding anything about it when I was young. |
| |
| ▲ | serial_dev 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Then they justify it because they vibe-coded a proof of concept in Tauri, and it was even worse. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | m-s-y 21 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That “but” needs to be an “and”. |
|
| ▲ | ndr42 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Had to let this here: A TV clip on YouTube of an episode of “That’s Incredible”, featuring Apple co-founder Stephen “Woz” Wozniak (aged 38) running through a maze and nearly winning. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoJexQjoMtk (found on the blog of Cabel Sasser: https://cabel.com/woz-vs-wooz/) |
|
| ▲ | ChrisMarshallNY 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > his post-Apple life has mattered in ways that have nothing to do with money or power. Sounds a bit like Jimmy Carter. His best and most influential work came after he left The Oval Office. |
| |
| ▲ | bazoom42 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Maybe best, but suerly not most influential. | | |
| ▲ | ChrisMarshallNY 29 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I guess it depends on people’s priorities. He won that Nobel for some stuff he did in office, but probably more for his peacemaking efforts, afterwards. I think his Habitat for Humanity work was pretty damn important. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | OhMeadhbh 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's kinda funny... In '89 a friend and I were talking about starting a startup like the two Steve's (we didn't know about Ron Wayne back then.) We both knew exactly what Woz did, but were a bit sketchy on Jobs role in the early days. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Jobs was a layabout, only that the strengths he brought to the table were more abstract. So I would also say... the kinds of things we learn from Woz are concrete and we get immediate feedback if we learned them wrong. |
| |
| ▲ | Tor3 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Woz talked about the early days in an interview, and he said something like (paraphrasing) "Steve [Jobs] could call companies and get free samples for me, and negotiate low prices for other stuff, something I simply couldn't do". It sounds like they complemented each other during the startup. And it was Jobs who suggested that they should try running a company. |
|
|
| ▲ | OhMeadhbh 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I learned some very bad jokes from him. |
|
| ▲ | rajayonin 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Only one Woz? What about Scott? |
| |
| ▲ | egoisticalgoat 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | As someone who never heard Steve Wozniak being called "Woz", Scott was the only Woz on my mind. | |
| ▲ | OhMeadhbh 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There would be no Scott were it not for Woz (or even Avi.) | |
| ▲ | knorker 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The fact that you have to be more specific than "Scott" says a lot. | | |
| ▲ | testfrequency 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | That’s more likely just you. Anyone who knows Apple knows who “Scott” is referring to. Scott Forstall. | | |
| ▲ | LukeShu 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Heh, I assumed he was referring to "Scott the Woz" Scott Wozniak, a vintage-gaming youtuber. I assumed that the GP took a more literal attack on "only one 'Woz'", hile you took a more symbolic "only one engineer of such quality". In the context of Apple, sure "Scott" is Scott Forstall, but that's not necessarily the context. | | |
| ▲ | testfrequency 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | I could be wrong then if that was their reference. I was in the mindset of foundational Apple leaders, not other Woz’s outside the Apple hemisphere. EDIT: reading this again, now thinking you are right and they are just being snarky about the “one Woz in the world” existing. |
| |
| ▲ | knorker 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Woz is not just "some guy at apple". He's a force in his own right to the point of being bigger than Apple in some ways. "Woz" is googlable. His name doesn't need context. "Larry" could be Ellison or Page. "Scott" could be Forstall or Adams. Who played Scott Forstall in the movie? Anyway, other comments proven it's not just me, too. | |
| ▲ | vasco 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | That's crazy because I assumed they were obviously talking about Apple's first CEO. For "Scott Apple" search string, Google agrees with me and the forstall guy is just a secondary mention. | | |
| ▲ | testfrequency 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | For me he will always be “Scotty”. “Scott” at Apple will almost always imply Scott Forstall. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | yodsanklai 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| he's also not afraid to speak out https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ck-f3qZVcWM |
|
| ▲ | qingcharles 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Coincidentally one of the earliest Apple I prototypes ends its auction tomorrow if you have over $500K to spare: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46605420 |
|
| ▲ | q2dg 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| For me, anyone who is involved in FOSDEM in any way deserves more respect (regarding revolutionary things we can learn) |
| |
| ▲ | direwolf20 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | You can just go to FOSDEM, it's open entry. If you're in Brussels this weekend. |
|
|
| ▲ | Joel_Mckay 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I find it amusing people still port in WozMon for modern 6502 trainer hobby machines. =3 |
|
| ▲ | mocmoc 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Woz is the man |
|
| ▲ | andrewstuart 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| People are crediting Woz here with great things but not going far enough. Woz invented the consumer personal computer. That is one of the greatest inventions in human history, perhaps the greatest. |
| |
| ▲ | BirAdam 26 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Well, that's a highly contested claim. There was quite a bit of prior art. |
|