Because they bought a claude subscription on a personal account and the error message said that they belongs to a "disabled organization" (probably leaking some implementation details).

▲

fluoridation 5 hours ago | parent [-]

That's the part I understand. It's the other term that I don't understand.

▲

mattnewton 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Then I’m confused about what is confusing you haha.

The absurd language is meant to highlight the absurdity they feel over the vague terms in their sparse communication with anthropic. It worked for me.

▲

fluoridation 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Because what is meant by "this organization has been disabled" is fairly obvious. The object in Anthropic's systems belonging to the class Organization has changed to the state Disabled, so the call cannot be executed. Anthropic itself is not an organization in this sense, nor is Google, so I would say that referring to them as "non-disabled organizations" is an equivocation fallacy. Besides that, I can't tell if it's a joke, if it's some kind of statement, or what is being communicated. To me it's just obtuseness for the sake of itself.

	▲	mattnewton 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It’s a joke because they do not see themselves as an organization, they bought a personal account, were banned without explanation and their only communication refers to them as a “disabled organization”. Anthropic and Google are organizations, and so an “un disabled organization” here is using that absurdly vague language as a way to highlight how bad their error message was. It’s obtuseness to show how obtuse the error message was to them.
	▲	nofriend 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		>To me it's just obtuseness for the sake of itself. ironic, isn't it?