Care to explain how the volume of AI research papers authored by Chinese researchers[1] has exceeded US-published ones? Time-traveling plagiarism perhaps, since you believe the US is destined to lead always.

1. Chinese researcher in China, to be more specific.

▲

bfeynman 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Not a great metric, research in academia doesn't necessarily translate to value. In the US they've poached so many academics because of how much value they directly translate to.

▲

jacquesm 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Volume is easy: they have far more people, it is quality that counts.

▲

overfeed an hour ago | parent [-]

Perhaps you should pay attention to where the puck is going to be, rather than where it is currently. Lots of original ideas are coming out of Chinese AI research[1], denying this betrays some level of cope.

1. e.g. select any DeepSeek release, and read the accompanying paper

	▲	jacquesm 32 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I'll pay attention to where the puck is because that is something I can observe, where it is going to be is anybody's guess. Lots of original ideas are coming out of Chinese AI research but there is also lots of junk. I think in the longer term they will have the advantage but right now that simply isn't the case. Your 'cope' accusation has no place here, I have no dog in the race and do not need to cope with anything.
	▲	sieabahlpark an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[dead]