| ▲ | willtemperley 3 hours ago |
| How do you think all of that data used to be managed before we decided the best thing was to trust big tech with everything? |
|
| ▲ | whateverboat an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| With lot of errors and huge cost. |
|
| ▲ | SpicyLemonZest 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It used to be emailed around, and when you explained to people that "encrypted" email usually exposes your plaintext to relays they'd shrug. If they bothered with encryption at all, which most people and providers didn't until big tech started pushing the issue a decade ago. |
| |
| ▲ | willtemperley 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | How is that relevant to data storage, locality and access now? Secure endpoints don’t have to be managed by huge companies running data lakes which could be anywhere. The current best security practices can be used by any organisation. I respect the engineering that Google have done. gRPC is excellent and local first software can absolutely use it, accessing data locality verified endpoints. | | |
| ▲ | SpicyLemonZest 36 minutes ago | parent [-] | | In my experience, the best practice for sharing "health data? Government data? Corporate data? Financial data?" within an organization is to use a secure cloud platform with native data sharing functionality. The original comment's suggestion for "local-first software" doesn't work, because organizations frequently need to forward private data between individual workstations and the staff are going to do it using email if you don't give them something better. |
| |
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|