| ▲ | yokoprime 14 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Im sorry, but i dont buy that. Unix certification has nothing to do with number of processes running or "efficiency"! The OS must be SUS compliant, i.e have all the core interfaces in place, all the correct utilities (awk, grep, vi, sed etc) and theres something about header files, filesystem requirements etc. even if the macOS submitted for certification is super trimmed down, it does not matter as long as its a true subset of what is shipped to consumers. MacOS is certified UNIX i.e its "UNIX", like it or not. On this point the article is just wrong. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | timetopay 13 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unix is both a family of operating systems and also a trademark. The name is overloaded - "Unix" is more than one thing at the same time. In addition, the trademark is "UNIX" and the operating system family is "Unix" MacOS is both UNIX and also not Unix at the same time. If the trademark holders decided to UNIX certify my cat, which is well within their legal right to do so, would that make her UNIX? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||