Remix.run Logo
yokoprime 14 hours ago

Im sorry, but i dont buy that. Unix certification has nothing to do with number of processes running or "efficiency"! The OS must be SUS compliant, i.e have all the core interfaces in place, all the correct utilities (awk, grep, vi, sed etc) and theres something about header files, filesystem requirements etc. even if the macOS submitted for certification is super trimmed down, it does not matter as long as its a true subset of what is shipped to consumers.

MacOS is certified UNIX i.e its "UNIX", like it or not. On this point the article is just wrong.

timetopay 13 hours ago | parent [-]

Unix is both a family of operating systems and also a trademark. The name is overloaded - "Unix" is more than one thing at the same time. In addition, the trademark is "UNIX" and the operating system family is "Unix"

MacOS is both UNIX and also not Unix at the same time.

If the trademark holders decided to UNIX certify my cat, which is well within their legal right to do so, would that make her UNIX?

greggsy 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Unlike macOS, your cat does not, and will not, meet the industry-accepted standard that describes unix as we know it today.

https://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/xym0.htm

shiomiru 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> as we know it today

An important nuance you seem to be missing is that SUSv3 is equivalent to "IEEE Std 1003.1-2001" (that is, POSIX 2001).

In practice, I've had to work around more POSIX compatibility issues in macOS than in all other actively developed (Free) Unix-likes, combined.

bigyabai 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Like macOS, my cat does not qualify for the UNIX standard out-of-the-box and I'm far too lazy to configure my cat for an OS standard that's 25 years obsolete.

remix2000 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Mayhaps not with a `cat(1)` alone, but really they just need to expand their menagerie now.

remix2000 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Or perhaps they just won't certify your cat just as Apple won't start making Windows PCs…?