| ▲ | 201-12958 4 hours ago |
| The EU leaders falsely assume that US cloud services are essential and let themselves be blackmailed over and over again. If you want to do your part as a consumer, boycott all American products: https://www.goeuropean.org/ |
|
| ▲ | sschueller 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| https://di.day/ |
|
| ▲ | devsda 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| When my country and China had border clashes, there was a nation-wide grassroot level movement to boycott Chinese goods and services where possible. It worked to an extent but it fizzled out in few weeks/months. Some of the reasons were the impracticality of total boycott so you start from a position of compromise, difficulty to sustain a movement born out of anger and some inter-govt agreements to avoid escalations etc. Do you have plans to overcome those sort of challenges and sustain this initiative ? |
| |
| ▲ | joe_mamba 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You speak about India? Yeah, EU is super fucked too since it outsourced its energy dependence to Russia, consumer manufacturing to China, defence and tech services to US, and only just woke up in the last 3 or so years that it was all a huge mistake that's now costing us dearly since we're at the whims of all 3 belligerents who know that now is the time they can squeeze us. Trying to undo just one dependency is a slow and painful process, but fighting all 3 at the same time is a suicide mission. The US outsourced its manufacturing too, but unlike EU, it has a strong enough economy and military that they can just snap their fingers and the likes of Taiwan and Korea will immediately onshore manufacturing of their high end chips and ships to the US, but EU doesn't have this kind leverage. | | |
| ▲ | js8 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > only just woke up in the last 3 or so years that it was all a huge mistake If only! We just outsourced all our agriculture to Latin America (MERCOSUR free trade agreement). | | |
| |
| ▲ | deaux 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Boycotting US tech is magnitudes easier than boycotting Chinese-made products. They're in whole different universes. Especially on a country level, let alone a EU level. Is removing the dependence on US tech easy for the EU? No, it's tough and takes a lot of work and time. It's still a piece of cake compared to the dependence on Chinese manufacturing. They're incomparable. | | |
| ▲ | austinthetaco 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Does that include not using AWS or anyone that is a host interface to AWS? Does that include social media like hacker news or instagram? I have no stakes here (I'm an American who doesn't run a tech business) but it seems like it would be unfathomly difficult if not impossible to avoid US tech altogether. | | |
| ▲ | danmaz74 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Nobody serious is advocating to avoid US tech altogether, at least unless Trump starts a hot war, but reducing dependency would be a very smart move. |
| |
| ▲ | devsda 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The most critical and impactful modern day tech is smartphone and that is US tech. As long as mobile os and adjacent services like the store etc are controlled there is no true path to digital independence especially in a highly digitalized region like the EU. One example is if EU allows the Android developer verification to pass this year in its current or even in more relaxed form, that just means EU is still open for some hard lessons in the future. | |
| ▲ | the_duke 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Tell that to all the companies that built their entire tech stacks on US cloud providers... Massive endeavor for a lot of setups. | | |
| ▲ | GuB-42 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | While it is a "massive endeavor", it is not impossible, it essentially amounts to writing portable code. A computer is a computer, and most of the tech stack in US cloud providers is based on open source projects. Not depending on Chinese manufacturing is borderline impossible even if you are starting from scratch. Not only it will be way more expensive, with potentially longer delays and lesser capacities, but just finding some company that can and wants to do the job can be a nightmare. From what I have seen, many local manufacturers in the US and Europe are really there to fulfill government contracts that requires local production. Most hardware kickstarter-like projects rely on Chinese manufacturing as if it was obvious. It is not "find a manufacturer", it is "go to China". Projects that instead rely on local (US/Europe) manufacturing in order to make a political statement have to to though a lot of trouble, and the result is often an overpriced product that may still have some parts made in China. | | |
| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Anyone who thinks migrations at scale is just about “writing portable code” has never done a migration at scale. A large corporation just migrating from everything hosted on VMs can take years. And if you are responsible for an ETL implementation and working with AWS and have your files stored on S3 (every provider big and small has S3 compatible storage) and your data is hosted on Aurora Postgres, are you going to spend time creating a complicated ETL process or are you going to just schedule a cron job to run “select outfile into S3”? And “most” of the services on AWS aren’t based on open source software and you still have to provision your resources using IAC and your architecture. No Terraform doesn’t give you “cloud agnosticism” any more than using Python when using AWS services. |
|
| |
| ▲ | danmaz74 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | By the way, the emergence of LLM coding tools could make it even easier than before to reduce that dependence, as the cost of reproducing many of the mature technologies is going to cost less than it would have before. Ironically, doing that may require using US tools (like Claude Code), at least for now, but it could be a very interesting evolution/opportunity for Europe. | | |
| ▲ | petcat an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > the emergence of LLM coding tools could make it even easier than before I find this highly optimistic. It will take years, maybe decades for EU to replace US clouds and tech. And if they're going to do it with LLMs, then it will take billions of euros in devs and tokens (again, all going to US tech companies). Meanwhile, USA continues to strategically re-home TSMC to Arizona whilst simultaneously make huge investments to invigorate Intel and Micron. Over the last decade USA and China have doubled-down on massive investments to out-compete each other while the EU seems like it's struggling to understand where to even begin. | |
| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yes, I can see Claude Code making it easier to reproduce - Redshift (or Snowflake) - or anything else you need to be reliable and performant at scale. | | |
| ▲ | vjerancrnjak an hour ago | parent [-] | | Both products are nothing but reliable. Redshift can’t even go around partitioning limits, or S3 limits. But what’s funny is that Claude Code is from US company so can’t be used in a boycott scenario | | |
| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 32 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Redshift is used at the largest e-commerce site in the world and was built specifically to “shift” away from “Big Red” (Oracle). | | |
| ▲ | vjerancrnjak 19 minutes ago | parent [-] | | What can I say, I expected more than what they actually offer. A Redshift job can fail because S3 tells it to slow down. How can I make this HA performance product slower given its whole moat is an S3 based input output interface. As a compute engine its SQL capabilities are worse than the slowest pretend timeseries db like Elasticsearch. | | |
| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Are you trying to treat an OLAP database with columnar storage like an OLTP database? If you are, you would probably have the same issue with Snowflake. As far as S3, are you trying to ingest a lot of small files or one large file? Again Redshift is optimized for bulk imports. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | bluegatty 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The government has to mandate it on some level with purchasing power. If the government switched away from Microsft and refused to accept MS document formats for any legal reason - then things might shift. Most businesses just don't care, they want they easy button. A law firm does not want to screw around, they just click 'buy' on Word, Outlook, Teams. There's a deep psychology to it. I remember a developer telling me that Oracle 'was the only real database'. It's not so much propaganda, just the propagandistic power of incumbency. People who only know one thing are hard pressed to believe there could be something else. This is more than 50% brand, narrative etc. We techies tend to underestimate the power of perception, even when it's of our own creation etc. i.e. people fighting over Linux and it's various distros. | |
| ▲ | boerseth 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It is understanably hard to stay vigilant with respect to individual everyday purchases, but services and subscriptions are an easy and continuous win. | |
| ▲ | dathinab an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | to be honest I don't expect a effective long term consumer boycott but any companies which have their brand closely tied to the US image (e.g. Coca Cola) will most likely have bug issues and if people have a choice between a product from a company they now is EU or better local and one where they don't know about it the choice will be influenced by it and maybe we can finally take tear down some of the absurd misinformation companies and corruption originating from MS and similar. (E.g. systematic malicious misinformation often supplemented with non fair competition/subsidization and outright bribery (no joke, MS has (through middle mans) wide spread bribed public, research and school organizations in Germany, like actual bribes, not just things which should count as bribes but do not(1))) (1): I knew some people which had been involved in it. But any case where legal actions where taken ended without relevant outcome because all the blame always feel to the sales middle man AFIK and supposedly MS didn't know. Also the bribes mostly ended up as additional founding for the research institute and only in small parts in personal pockets from what I have heard. At the same time politics have caused so massive issues due to incompetently made laws and regulations for many public organizations that accepting this bribes and using them as additional founds often looked as a necessary evil... :sob: (yes I know there are not emotes on HN) | |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | sillyfluke 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| >The EU leaders falsely assume that US cloud services are essential and let themselves be blackmailed over and over again. I for one seriously doubt they assume such a thing. They are most likely given something in return that they think somehow makes such a trade worth it. Whether it's access to some fancy US intel/survelliance tech, "discounts" on US defense purchases or what have you, until you get transparency or clarity on the very specific items included in all these deals it's hard to determine the scale of their stupidity. It's either that or personal bribes, blackmail, and kickbacks to key EU politicians depending on the EU country in question. If there was a "false assumption" above all others it was most likely the assumption that the post-WWII US foreign policy towards Europe would continue to the end of their lifetimes. |
|
| ▲ | rob74 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Since "Cola" is listed in the "popular alternatives" box, I think it's important to mention that most European Coca-Cola bottlers operate as franchises, i.e. they license the Coca-Cola brand and get the syrup for the drinks they bottle from the Atlanta-based HQ, but other than that they are locally-owned companies. So if you boycott Coca-Cola brands, maybe 20% of the impact goes to Coca-Cola US, while 80% is felt by the local company and its employees. |
| |
| ▲ | PaulRobinson 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That just means they have all the infrastructure they need to bottle syrup from another source and start selling that instead - no capex needed, just maybe need to get together with other franchisees and figure out how to spend some opex on marketing and getting it onto store shelves. Coca-cola has a moat, but it's hardly protective of franchisees here. | | |
| ▲ | blell 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There must be thousands of soda manufacturers in Europe. I can buy dozens of sodas where I live. But they are not Coca Cola. | | |
| ▲ | anilgulecha 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | From a recent hn discussion there's https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDkH3EbWTYc | |
| ▲ | immibis 36 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | They are bottled at the same places that bottle Coca-Cola. If those places stop paying for their Coca-Cola brand license because nobody is buying it... then okay? so what? Or, now that someone's reverse-engineered the Coca-Cola formula and everyone's saying we need to stop pandering to USA IP rights, governments have the opportunity to do the funniest thing ever. I think Russia already did. |
| |
| ▲ | wpm 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Someone just used gas chromatography to develop a seemingly passable knock off of the unpatented Coca Cola formula and posted it online.
https://youtu.be/TDkH3EbWTYc | | |
| ▲ | amarcheschi 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I firmly believe that such thing is already know by companies... In the niche perfumes hobby, you have small brands doing that or people paying for gcms analysis on perfumes, i guess that companies have already done that on coke for decades |
|
| |
| ▲ | pjc50 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's arguably unhealthy that one company has such global dominance over any market, even a trivial one like soft drinks. | |
| ▲ | dukeyukey 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > So if you boycott Coca-Cola brands, maybe 20% of the impact goes to Coca-Cola US, while 80% is felt by the local company and its employees. Assuming the person burns the money they would've spent on Cola in the first place. But they aren't, they'll probably just redirect that money to an alternative soft drink, probably a more local one. | | |
| ▲ | dathinab 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | exactly idk. about other EU Countries but at least in Germany outside of small country side stores you tend to have a very wide variety of "alternative" soft drinks. Some trying to emulate some big brand (e.g. Coca Cola) but also many keeping the concept
(Cola) and putting their own twist on it. Most importantly most of them seem to be
EU based (and often Germany based and sometimes local to your region). The main drawback of them is that due to them operating on a (way) smaller scale and need to have a factor to differentiate themself, so most of them are more expensive.
(but there are cheap no-brand clones, too). A much bigger problem is that Nestle and co. try to either buy up any new innovative successful German food/drink companies. Sure after being bought up they tend to continue operate like before so technically they aren't dependent on the US, but they have been bought up anyway. | | |
| ▲ | jsnell 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Nestle is Swiss, not American, so that seems like a very strange example to use. |
| |
| ▲ | xvector 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If you totally remove Coke from the market, sure, but no one wants to drink a knockoff Coke, they want the actual thing. | | |
| ▲ | dathinab 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | actual, that is de-facto wrong many alternative Colas don't try to imitate Coca Cola but give Cola their own twist, and IMHO multiple of them taste noticeable better then Coca Cola and for people with little money getting cheaper knock-off is pretty common and people get used to it at the same time Coca Colas brand isn't seen as "fancy"/"high quality"/"well regarded" enough anymore. So many restaurants for which cola isn't just a "default fallback they don't care about" but a drink commonly combined with their meals, started serving other Cola brand like e.g. Fritz Cola, Mio Mio Cola or Afri Cola. Also some of the more beer/alk. focused companies have started to branch out to soft drinks as Alkohole consume is going down with some surprise successes (e.g. Paulana Spezi) but also with existing distribution contracts with Restaurants and Food Chains, so their stuff is popping up increasingly more often. And I mean we are still speaking about the kind of soft drink with the most dominant brand control (Cola/Coca Cola), for all other soft drinks the US companies have a far less strong hold on them. And sure some pople like I guess you will insist on drinking Coca Cola. But also if the US continues to paint themself as the new big evil (while Russia looks increasingly weak, and China is clever enough to move mostly behind the scene) then it's just a matter of time until people will start ostracizing people for buying (unnecessary) products which are "well known US" and haven't somehow separated their company image from the US. Like seriously how did the US became so incompetent in politics that you find people all over the EU which think joining with China against the US would be a good idea and long term better for their quality of live... like wtf. | |
| ▲ | dukeyukey 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | We are talking about individuals here. People are absolutely capable of not drinking Coke because they want to avoid American products. | | |
| ▲ | xvector 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I promise you that virtually no people care about avoiding American products that much. You are being idealistic, and are simply out of touch with the average person if you actually believe this. Virtually one will stop buying Coke. Virtually no one will stop wanting an iPhone. So on and so forth. They will gladly criticize the US while continuing to indulge in the biggest brand names. | | |
| ▲ | toyg 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > no people care about avoiding American products that much. Today, yes. Once US troops start forcefully occupying European territory, eh... | |
| ▲ | dukeyukey 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | There have already been significant decreases in Canadian (and likely other countries) purchases of American goods, and travel to the US. The thing you say will never happen, already happened last year. Jim Beam (the bourbon distillery) said before Trump 10% of their sales were to Canada, and that has gone to nearly zero. | | |
| ▲ | dathinab 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | yep, and in some part of the EU the dominant position of Coca Cola has been crumbling for reasons unrelated to the US and many "not a cheap knock off" alternative already exist... |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | toyg 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Only if knockoff are not of the same quality, which is the case because competing on price is a race to the bottom. But if it becomes a brand issue, and some serious investment can be justified, then consumer adoption can be engineered. | | |
| ▲ | xvector 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | It was always a branding issue. But it is not so easy to engineer consumer adoption unless you directly subvert consumer will (ie higher taxes on Coke, etc.) | | |
| ▲ | dathinab 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | or by being ostracized for drinking Cola (Coca Cola has bound it's brand tightly to the US image, which was grate for them after WW2, but is pretty bad for them now that Trump is very reliably destroying the US image). or by most people agreeing Cola isn't healthy, so it's becomes a Luxus product they just sometimes drink and then going for a slightly more "interesting" alternative brand which fit's more the "fancy treat" vibe is pretty common (we already have been seeing this in part of Germany, where it's not rare that restaurants serve Fritz or Afro Cola over Coca Cola as the Brands "seem" more fancy while Coca Cola feels more like the cheaper non fancy choice. By being relative cheap Coca Cola might have opened created the perfect basis for it being replaced in the "fancy" context. And by it not being cheap enough it get replaced in the "people with no money" context. This leads the "in between" context (which would still be a majority in Germany) and all the US food chains etc. but only if the people don't have a personal reason to switch. Most people in Germany drink Cola only from time to time. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | LtWorf an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Good thing that locally we produce other sugary drinks that we can buy instead! |
|
|
| ▲ | anal_reactor 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| China making a firewall so that it would grow its own tech industry instead of relying on the US was, in retrospect, a really smart move. |
| |
| ▲ | xienze 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | It was also very smart of them to send their citizens to US universities and companies and exfiltrate research and IP to grow their own tech industry... |
|