Remix.run Logo
devsda 4 hours ago

When my country and China had border clashes, there was a nation-wide grassroot level movement to boycott Chinese goods and services where possible. It worked to an extent but it fizzled out in few weeks/months. Some of the reasons were the impracticality of total boycott so you start from a position of compromise, difficulty to sustain a movement born out of anger and some inter-govt agreements to avoid escalations etc.

Do you have plans to overcome those sort of challenges and sustain this initiative ?

joe_mamba 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You speak about India?

Yeah, EU is super fucked too since it outsourced its energy dependence to Russia, consumer manufacturing to China, defence and tech services to US, and only just woke up in the last 3 or so years that it was all a huge mistake that's now costing us dearly since we're at the whims of all 3 belligerents who know that now is the time they can squeeze us.

Trying to undo just one dependency is a slow and painful process, but fighting all 3 at the same time is a suicide mission.

The US outsourced its manufacturing too, but unlike EU, it has a strong enough economy and military that they can just snap their fingers and the likes of Taiwan and Korea will immediately onshore manufacturing of their high end chips and ships to the US, but EU doesn't have this kind leverage.

js8 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> only just woke up in the last 3 or so years that it was all a huge mistake

If only! We just outsourced all our agriculture to Latin America (MERCOSUR free trade agreement).

2 hours ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
deaux 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Boycotting US tech is magnitudes easier than boycotting Chinese-made products. They're in whole different universes. Especially on a country level, let alone a EU level.

Is removing the dependence on US tech easy for the EU? No, it's tough and takes a lot of work and time. It's still a piece of cake compared to the dependence on Chinese manufacturing. They're incomparable.

austinthetaco 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Does that include not using AWS or anyone that is a host interface to AWS? Does that include social media like hacker news or instagram? I have no stakes here (I'm an American who doesn't run a tech business) but it seems like it would be unfathomly difficult if not impossible to avoid US tech altogether.

danmaz74 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Nobody serious is advocating to avoid US tech altogether, at least unless Trump starts a hot war, but reducing dependency would be a very smart move.

devsda 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The most critical and impactful modern day tech is smartphone and that is US tech.

As long as mobile os and adjacent services like the store etc are controlled there is no true path to digital independence especially in a highly digitalized region like the EU.

One example is if EU allows the Android developer verification to pass this year in its current or even in more relaxed form, that just means EU is still open for some hard lessons in the future.

the_duke 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Tell that to all the companies that built their entire tech stacks on US cloud providers...

Massive endeavor for a lot of setups.

GuB-42 3 hours ago | parent [-]

While it is a "massive endeavor", it is not impossible, it essentially amounts to writing portable code. A computer is a computer, and most of the tech stack in US cloud providers is based on open source projects.

Not depending on Chinese manufacturing is borderline impossible even if you are starting from scratch. Not only it will be way more expensive, with potentially longer delays and lesser capacities, but just finding some company that can and wants to do the job can be a nightmare. From what I have seen, many local manufacturers in the US and Europe are really there to fulfill government contracts that requires local production.

Most hardware kickstarter-like projects rely on Chinese manufacturing as if it was obvious. It is not "find a manufacturer", it is "go to China". Projects that instead rely on local (US/Europe) manufacturing in order to make a political statement have to to though a lot of trouble, and the result is often an overpriced product that may still have some parts made in China.

raw_anon_1111 an hour ago | parent [-]

Anyone who thinks migrations at scale is just about “writing portable code” has never done a migration at scale.

A large corporation just migrating from everything hosted on VMs can take years.

And if you are responsible for an ETL implementation and working with AWS and have your files stored on S3 (every provider big and small has S3 compatible storage) and your data is hosted on Aurora Postgres, are you going to spend time creating a complicated ETL process or are you going to just schedule a cron job to run “select outfile into S3”?

And “most” of the services on AWS aren’t based on open source software and you still have to provision your resources using IAC and your architecture. No Terraform doesn’t give you “cloud agnosticism” any more than using Python when using AWS services.

danmaz74 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

By the way, the emergence of LLM coding tools could make it even easier than before to reduce that dependence, as the cost of reproducing many of the mature technologies is going to cost less than it would have before. Ironically, doing that may require using US tools (like Claude Code), at least for now, but it could be a very interesting evolution/opportunity for Europe.

petcat 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> the emergence of LLM coding tools could make it even easier than before

I find this highly optimistic. It will take years, maybe decades for EU to replace US clouds and tech. And if they're going to do it with LLMs, then it will take billions of euros in devs and tokens (again, all going to US tech companies).

Meanwhile, USA continues to strategically re-home TSMC to Arizona whilst simultaneously make huge investments to invigorate Intel and Micron.

Over the last decade USA and China have doubled-down on massive investments to out-compete each other while the EU seems like it's struggling to understand where to even begin.

raw_anon_1111 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes, I can see Claude Code making it easier to reproduce - Redshift (or Snowflake) - or anything else you need to be reliable and performant at scale.

vjerancrnjak an hour ago | parent [-]

Both products are nothing but reliable. Redshift can’t even go around partitioning limits, or S3 limits.

But what’s funny is that Claude Code is from US company so can’t be used in a boycott scenario

raw_anon_1111 37 minutes ago | parent [-]

Redshift is used at the largest e-commerce site in the world and was built specifically to “shift” away from “Big Red” (Oracle).

vjerancrnjak 24 minutes ago | parent [-]

What can I say, I expected more than what they actually offer. A Redshift job can fail because S3 tells it to slow down. How can I make this HA performance product slower given its whole moat is an S3 based input output interface.

As a compute engine its SQL capabilities are worse than the slowest pretend timeseries db like Elasticsearch.

raw_anon_1111 17 minutes ago | parent [-]

Are you trying to treat an OLAP database with columnar storage like an OLTP database? If you are, you would probably have the same issue with Snowflake.

As far as S3, are you trying to ingest a lot of small files or one large file? Again Redshift is optimized for bulk imports.

bluegatty 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The government has to mandate it on some level with purchasing power.

If the government switched away from Microsft and refused to accept MS document formats for any legal reason - then things might shift.

Most businesses just don't care, they want they easy button.

A law firm does not want to screw around, they just click 'buy' on Word, Outlook, Teams.

There's a deep psychology to it.

I remember a developer telling me that Oracle 'was the only real database'.

It's not so much propaganda, just the propagandistic power of incumbency. People who only know one thing are hard pressed to believe there could be something else.

This is more than 50% brand, narrative etc.

We techies tend to underestimate the power of perception, even when it's of our own creation etc. i.e. people fighting over Linux and it's various distros.

boerseth 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It is understanably hard to stay vigilant with respect to individual everyday purchases, but services and subscriptions are an easy and continuous win.

dathinab an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

to be honest I don't expect a effective long term consumer boycott

but any companies which have their brand closely tied to the US image (e.g. Coca Cola) will most likely have bug issues

and if people have a choice between a product from a company they now is EU or better local and one where they don't know about it the choice will be influenced by it

and maybe we can finally take tear down some of the absurd misinformation companies and corruption originating from MS and similar. (E.g. systematic malicious misinformation often supplemented with non fair competition/subsidization and outright bribery (no joke, MS has (through middle mans) wide spread bribed public, research and school organizations in Germany, like actual bribes, not just things which should count as bribes but do not(1)))

(1): I knew some people which had been involved in it. But any case where legal actions where taken ended without relevant outcome because all the blame always feel to the sales middle man AFIK and supposedly MS didn't know. Also the bribes mostly ended up as additional founding for the research institute and only in small parts in personal pockets from what I have heard. At the same time politics have caused so massive issues due to incompetently made laws and regulations for many public organizations that accepting this bribes and using them as additional founds often looked as a necessary evil... :sob: (yes I know there are not emotes on HN)

3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]