| ▲ | seanmcdirmid 3 hours ago |
| What is NG good for? Induction cook tops perform better than gas ones, heat pumps do better than gas heaters. The only gap I can think of are just in time hot water heaters. |
|
| ▲ | vlovich123 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Perform better as in more efficient electrically, not necessarily more pleasant or efficient in the cooking process. For example, when cooking an omelette, a recommended technique is to angle the pan so the liquid part flows towards the hot part of the pan touching the flame as you slowly scrape the curds up to rest at the cooler part of the pan. AFAIK an induction cooktop is unable to simulate this technique. Now maybe there are similar ways of getting this, but there’s centuries of experience informing cooking on top of a fire in some form or another. The techniques for cooking on induction cooktops well have not been learned, taught and communicated. |
| |
| ▲ | Zigurd 19 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I have an old but still perfectly functional high-end gas cooktop. I have no plans to replace it. Sturdy cast-iron trivets are bulletproof. You get visual feedback about heat intensity. I use enough heavy Dutch ovens and stainless and cast-iron pans that a glass cooktop under them seems like an added risk. | |
| ▲ | danaris 34 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I've been cooking eggs on induction cooktops for something like a decade now; while it's true that you can't tilt the pan (the induction won't work, and the cooktop is likely to just say "nope, not operating without a pan on me"), I've had no trouble with getting either scrambled eggs or omelettes to be softly and evenly cooked. Perhaps it helps that I had never had that particular advice for cooking on gas/electric! |
|
|
| ▲ | nightski 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I own an induction stove, and overall really enjoy it. But there are certain types of cooking it's not nearly as well suited to (still possible, but not as good). One of those is cooking on a wok. But really it comes down to heating. Heat pumps are not universally better. We are currently sitting at -25C or so which is pretty common in the winter (it can even get a fair bit colder at times). Hardly any of the contractors around here work with heat pumps, and even the ones that do aren't aware of the latest tech. That said even if you could get a cutting edge system through sheer money/will I am not sure how it would perform without at least a gas backup. At least from an efficiency standpoint. Not to mention we have had electricity go out in the winter which can be life threatening or at least cause substantial damage to property. I can't remember ever having the gas go out. (we have generator backup but that couldn't run an electric furnace for very long). Lastly we have a gas water heater (tankless) and damn that thing is efficient. A few therms a month... |
| |
| ▲ | malfist an hour ago | parent [-] | | If you're really hampered by not having a wok behavior for your induction stove, good news! There are plugin induction woks! From what I hear they work great. Technology Connections on YouTube did a great video about them |
|
|
| ▲ | chongli 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Heat pumps do not do well when it's -40 outside. You can say "fine, but how often does it get that cold?" but consumers are not going to be happy with a heat pump if their pipes freeze during an extended cold snap. I live in Southern Ontario and I have a heat pump with an auxiliary natural gas furnace for emergency heating. The heat pump shoulders most of the heating load but the thermostat does kick on the furnace when the heat pump starts falling behind. It should also be noted that although heat pumps are very efficient, even when it's below freezing outside, they cannot raise the temperature of the house very quickly. Consumers are generally quite unhappy when it takes 8 hours to raise the temperature of the house by 1 degree, so the thermostat usually calls for the furnace to start up before things get that bad. |
| |
| ▲ | darkr 4 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | air source heat pumps, though they're improving won't do well in extreme cold; even if they can operate they'll still be running at much lower efficiency. For temperatures significantly into negative territory a ground source heat pump would perform far better, where it can draw on a source of heat that will always be at least above freezing. A hybrid system doesn't seem like a bad trade-off though.. | |
| ▲ | Aurornis 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Canada's climate is really different when it comes to the extreme cold. Heat pumps are getting better at lower temperatures, but in an environment like Canada you still want auxiliary heat to be safe. > It should also be noted that although heat pumps are very efficient, even when it's below freezing outside, they cannot raise the temperature of the house very quickly. Consumers are generally quite unhappy when it takes 8 hours to raise the temperature of the house by 1 degree That would be an undersized heat pump in any regard. The installer would be at fault for screwing up that badly. You're right that efficiency falls off at lower temperatures, 8 hours to move 1 degree would be from the installer sizing the unit wrong. | | |
| ▲ | chongli 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's not just the efficiency of the heat pump that is at issue, it's the insulation of the house. As the outside temperature plunges, the house begins cooling off much more rapidly. This means the reduced efficiency of the heat pump (operating in cold outdoor temperatures) needs to produce more heating than it would at higher temperatures, and it's just not capable of that. My house was built in the 1980s and its insulation has always been more than adequate for the original natural gas furnace to be able to heat. The heat pump I have is only a few years old and cost $12,000 installed (before tax credits). To be able to rapidly heat the house when it's -40 outside would require a system costing several times that! Much cheaper just to use a furnace for those few days per year. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | tzs 22 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Backup generator for power outages. NG usually still works during electric outages. A generator that you do not need to periodically go out to get more fuel for can be very convenient. |
|
| ▲ | beached_whale 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Better is subjective here. Vancouver will be a bit different with it's warmer weather, but for the week or two at -30C to -40C(like I get) it provides a lot more heat at a lower price and in Canada, at least Ontario, it is still much cheaper to heat a home and water with. I'll probably go heat pump if my boiler goes as I can avoid the cost of adding ductwork(really expensive these days and more than furnace for install) and get A\C too. |
|
| ▲ | 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | spockz 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think NG outperforms in high efficiency heaters when the outside temperature is around 1-4 degrees Celsius with humidity as it causes ice buildup on the external unit which then has to be cleared using resistive heating. Also if only little hot water is required sporadically, heating it just in time with gas is more efficient than keeping a buffer heated for long times. Also, heat pumps do best when the temperature differential is lower. So in older housing without floor heating or duct heating, it is typically not as efficient to use a heat pump when the water to heat has to be above 55 degrees Celsius. For any new residential construction I think there is very little value in natural gas. |
| |
| ▲ | eldaisfish 29 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Methane has lots of value in colder climates, especially much of Canada. Methane is cheap and does not lose heating capacity as temperature falls. Across most of Canada, the median construction year for a typical house is in the 1980. Half were built before that, meaning insulation standards were lower. The #1 problem with heat pumps in Canada is low temperature performance. The heat output drops but the rate of heat loss from the house also increases. This is the precise situation where even backup resistive heat cannot keep up. Methane is excellent at filling this gap, especially now when winter temperatures swing more than earlier. |
|
|
| ▲ | walthamstow 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Induction is better in some ways and worse in others. It's so efficient and boils water like crazy but at low settings it's almost always pulsed rather than continuous and I've never liked that. I have both in my kitchen. |
|
| ▲ | tastyfreeze 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Gas cooktops are good for still being able to cook when the power is out. |
| |
| ▲ | Aurornis 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Interesting fact: A lot of modern gas cooktops have safety features that will cut the gas off when the electricity is out. The safety mechanisms are powered by electricity, so if they can't confirm that the operation is safe they fail with the gas valve shut off. It comes as a surprise to most users because power outages are so rare. They just assume it will work until 8 years later when they try to cook something during the first long outage in their area. | | |
| ▲ | 3eb7988a1663 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | TIL. Never used a modern gas stove, so I had not considered that without a pilot light, there must be a way to disable the flow or constantly spew gas into the house. Then again, I have had a pilot light go out for some amount of time without obvious ill effect, so the volume of gas must be low. | | |
| ▲ | tastyfreeze 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Pilot lights stay lit all the time so no igniter is required. My range has electric spark igniters. They don't work when the power is out but there is also no pilot light expelling gas. I just manually light the burner when the power is out. | | |
| ▲ | SoftTalker an hour ago | parent [-] | | My gas stove has spark ignitors for the burners and the oven has an incandescent ignitor. The oven has safety interlocks so the gas valve won't open if the ignitor is not hot. The oven cannot be lit manually, but the stovetop burners can. So in a power outage, I can cook in pots and pans but not bake. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | megaman821 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You could get a small propane burner or a lot of people have propane grills (sometimes with burners) in their backyards. Gas burners and stoves aren't bad but expanding the gas network to new homes is a huge expense. | |
| ▲ | jordanb 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Gas stoves need electricity for the starter these days. Maybe you can get a really old one with a pilot light. It's far easier to provide a backup for electric appliances using a generator, than it is to store CNG onsite for gas interruption. | | | |
| ▲ | microtonal 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I am not sure where you live, but I cannot remember the last time our power went out (Western Europe). I have gas-cooked since I was a kid (living in an area with a lot of natural gas, so houses were connected to gas since the 50ies), but induction is so much nicer that I'm happy to not be able to cook during a once in a ~10-20 year outage. Also a lot safer (it still happens quite frequently that a house blows up because of a gas leak, just this week there was a huge explosion in Utrecht what was presumably a gas leak). Of course, the equation may change for countries with less stable power. | | |
| ▲ | SoftTalker an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | In the central USA my power is out up to 3 or 4 times a year for an hour or more, and momentarily maybe once every month or two. It's due to our power distribution being mostly overhead lines which are vulnerable to falling trees, squirrels, ice accumulation, storm and wind damage, etc. Even though my neighborhood has buried lines, that's just the last mile. The incoming power is all overhead lines. | |
| ▲ | compumike 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's very local here. I'm in the suburbs of Philadelphia, in one of the highest income counties in the state, two blocks from a major hospital, one block from a suburban downtown. Despite that, I've experienced one or two 4-6 hour long power outages per year the past few years. (Mostly correlated with weather.) One outage in June 2025 was 50 hours long! Many larger homes in this area have whole-house generators (powered by utility natural gas) with automatic transfer switches. During the 50-hour outage, we "abandoned ship" and stayed with someone who also had an outage, but had a whole-house generator. Other areas just 5-10 miles away are like what you describe: maybe one outage in the past 10 years. | |
| ▲ | jlarocco 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Sadly one of those countries is the United States. Here in Colorado they've started pre-emptively shutting off power during wind storms when it's hot and dry because there have been multiple instances of wind blowing down power lines which then start big fires. We had one instance in December where the power was out 2-3 days for tens of thousands of people, and over a week for some people. Of course the problem is that nobody wants to pay to bury the lines. They'd need all new equipment for digging, to retrain all of the technicians, and get permission from a million different entities to dig up their land. We're effectively locked in to overhead cables. | |
| ▲ | tastyfreeze 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | On an island, in a rainforest with regular storms. The power goes out multiple times a year due to trees falling on power lines. We also don't have municipal gas lines piped everywhere. Delivery only. If you have a leak they won't deliver until its fixed. | |
| ▲ | bell-cot 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > I am not sure where you live, but I cannot remember the last time... Here in SE Michigan (USA) I have quite a few friends who've totaled more than 15 days without power in the past couple years. Most of that in multi-day outages. | |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
| |
| ▲ | danans 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I recommend a backup butane stove, which is what I have for outages where my induction stove doesn't work. Also an outdoor camp chef stove. Both are cheap and work great. My camp chef doubles as an outdoor pizza oven. | |
| ▲ | Retric 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Batteries or Generators don’t just let you cook and stay warm when the power is out but do everything else such as keep food cold as well. | | |
| ▲ | microtonal 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Do induction cooking tops work well on batteries (or generators)? IIRC our induction plate has two-phase power because it can pull more than 3.6kW. | | |
| ▲ | Retric 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Sure, as long as you size the system to expected loads. An 8kW generator suitable for occasional use is only ~1,000$. A Powerwall 3 does 11kW continuous and peaks at 30kW for transitory loads like starting heavy equipment. The most convenient solution where a generator automatically kicks in during a power outage requires an electrician and extra equipment, but there’s also real tradeoffs to having gas lines going to your home. | |
| ▲ | maxerickson 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | There are models that include a battery to reduce the input power requirement. That's not quite the same as the question, but it answers it, you just need a big enough battery and they are fine. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | rdn 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If the power goes out I can still cook and heat with gas. *this is a regular occurence in some countries |
|
| ▲ | diego_moita 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > What is NG good for? Mostly a myth by cooks that think it "heats faster" or "heats with a better distribution of heat". It is foolish, but many still think so. I personally believe that the only kind of cooking that benefits from NG are round-bottom woks. But they can be substituted by flat-bottom pans without problems. |
| |
| ▲ | moregrist 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Mostly a myth by cooks that think it "heats faster" It’s almost entirely about heat _control_, especially when you turn the heat down or off. Non-induction electric stoves can take minutes or longer for a burner to cool down. When you cut the heat on a NG stove, it’s essentially immediate. This matters quite a bit for heat-sensitive dishes like omelettes. Induction doesn’t have this problem, but also hasn’t been widely available until maybe recently and won’t work on a lot of aluminum cookware. So you’re asking people to change their cookware along with their range. That can be a bridge too far for many. | | |
| ▲ | diego_moita 10 minutes ago | parent [-] | | They are mostly Nouvelle & Haute Cuisine french dishes: omelettes, holandaise/bernaise sauces, custards (Crème Anglaise, Pots de Crème), melted chocolate, caramel, generally poached stuff, etc. For the lower temperatures, a lot of that temperature control can be made with bain marie (warm water). And the remaining ones aren't made in aluminum cookware, anyway. And people that cook such sophisticated food probably will have a lot of non-aluminum cookware, already. |
| |
| ▲ | chongli 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Flat bottom woks need a lot more oil to stir fry properly, due to the lack of pooling. Flat bottom woks on electric cooktops (radiant or induction) also tend to have essentially nonexistent heating of the side slopes, preventing you from using the technique of splashing soy sauce (and other cooking sauces, as well as cooking wines) in a wide arc so that it reduces rapidly to form a sticky coating for the food. Instead, all of the sauce will just run down to the bottom where it joins the rest of the liquids coming out of the food, contributing to boiling/steaming rather than stir frying. | |
| ▲ | youngtaff 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Burning gas also releases a lot of pollutants — we’ve a gas hob but always switch the extractor on when we use it because of this | | |
| ▲ | asdff 42 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | You should have the hood on while cooking no matter the type of stove top. | |
| ▲ | diego_moita 24 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Burning gas also releases a lot of pollutants To be more precise: mostly CO2 and small amounts of CO. But the actual concentration of CO2 in your house can be affected by a lot of other factors (ventilation, urban environment, weather, etc). |
|
|