Remix.run Logo
throwaway2037 2 hours ago

Not to side track too much from this discussion, but I looked at that PolyMarket event: "US civil war before 2027?" Currently, it is priced at 91.3 USD cents for No. If you bet 100 USD, the payout for No will be 109.43. That is very good return -- ~9.5% for 12 months of lending (as PolyMarket required full payment at the time of trade). That is twice the (retail) risk free rate at the moment. I am actually tempted to buy a large part of the order book. Am I missing something obvious?

Also, if you enjoy troll humor, the comments section is very funny.

walletdrainer an hour ago | parent | next [-]

> Am I missing something obvious?

The low volume places a rather disappointing cap on your profits.

cachius 14 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

PolyMarket bets are becoming ever more problematic the wider it gets known, carrying the manipulation incentives from stock markets into every bettable aspect of society.

> Total garbage. Spread by a $9bn company with a 1m-follower account, a post viewed by 4.5m people. Pure disinformation for financial gain, with serious consequences for actual human lives. Shashank Joshi - @shashj - Jan 12 - https://x.com/shashj/status/2010766014829478393

jddj an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There are a few like this. You can bet on Jesus not coming back in the calendar year for a little pocket money.

Funny, because a bit like the yes side of the civil war scenario, if JC comes back and someone is the sort of person to bet that he will, then do they really need the payout in those circumstances; and will the gambling website be in a position to pay out?

isubkhankulov 24 minutes ago | parent [-]

Polymarket and other prediction markets dont take risk on the trades. Two sides are needed to make a market so you’re likely to get your payout. So all the people taking the “safe” bet lose their collateral and the winners get the proceeds if the unlikely event happens.

nsvd2 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

If you haven't been paying attention to American politics, there are currently widespread protests due to a woman being shot by ICE last week. It looks like the current administration may be seeking violent unrest in the hopes of delaying elections.

JumpCrisscross 26 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

> looks like the current administration may be seeking violent unrest in the hopes of delaying elections

Civil war requires two militaries. Tiananmen Square wasn’t a civil war.

lukan 19 minutes ago | parent [-]

I believe there are plenty of weapons around in the US in general and the police and military is also not 100% behind Trump and MAGA.

johncolanduoni 23 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

But if there is a civil war, what were you going to be able to do with the USD anyway?

falcor84 3 minutes ago | parent [-]

Interesting - I found this quantitative historical study [0] showing that while a civil war does significantly increase the likelihood of inflation, only 36% of countries analyzed which had a civil war between 1975-1999 ended up in an inflationary crisis. And with the USD having such a strong foundation, I would expect the risk to be significantly lower.

[0] https://kjis.org/journal/view.html?uid=302&vmd=Full

derektank 31 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There were large protests in the wake of a law enforcement officer killing someone in 2020 too. Notably, there was not a civil war, even though the Trump administration used the protests as cover for bad behavior then too

GoblinSlayer 19 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

1. ban guns

2. start civil war

3. ???

4. civil war with stone axes