It really should be like that indeed. Where is RMS? Is he working on GPLv4?

twoodfin 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If model training is determined to be fair use under US copyright law—either legislated by Congress or interpreted by Federal courts—then no license text can remove the right to use source code that way.

	▲	RobotToaster an hour ago \| parent [-]
		> then no license text can remove the right to use source code that way. At least in the US. Quite what happens if another country ordered, say chatGPT, to be released under the AGPL since it was trained on AGPL code, who knows.

▲

trashb 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You can follow him on https://stallman.org/ What is he doing? I believe still giving talks and taking stance on current day political issues. Additionally I believe the last few years where quite turbulent so I assume he is taking life at his own pace.

▲

oblio 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

RMS is probably greatly behind the technical news at this point. I mean, he's surfing the web via a email summary of some websites. Even if he doesn't condone of how the internet is evolving, he can't really keep up with technology if he doesn't "mingle".

He's also 72, we can't expect him to save everyone. We need new generations of FOSS tech leaders.

▲

Imustaskforhelp 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I am gen-z and I am part of the foss community (I think) and one of the issues about new generations of FOSS tech leaders is that even if one tries to do so.

Something about Richard stallman really is out of this world where he made people care about Open source in the first place.

I genuinely don't know how people can relicate it. I had even tried and gone through such phase once but the comments weren't really helpful back then on hackernews

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45558430 (Ask HN: Why are most people not interested in FOSS/OSS and can we change that)

▲

teekert 5 hours ago | parent [-]

As much as RMS meant for the world, he’s also a pretty petty person. He’s about freedom but mostly about user freedom, not creators freedom. I also went through such a phase but using words like “evil” is just too black and white. I don’t think he is a nice person to be around.l, judging from some podcasts and videos.

▲

trashb 4 hours ago | parent [-]

If there is one thing Stallman knows well is the way he uses words and I can assure you if he calls something "evil" that is exactly the word he meant to use.

> user freedom, not creators freedom

In his view users are the creators and creators are the users. The only freedom he asks you to give up is the freedom to limit the freedom of others.

	▲	teekert 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		RMS asks you to give something up: Your right to share a thing you made, under your conditions (which may be conditions even the receiving party agree on), nobody is forced in this situation, and then he calls that evil. I think that is wrong. I love FOSS, don't get me wrong. But people should be able to say: I made this, if you want to use it, it's under these condition or I won't share it. Again, imho the GPL is a blessing for humanity, and bless the people that choose it freely.