I am gen-z and I am part of the foss community (I think) and one of the issues about new generations of FOSS tech leaders is that even if one tries to do so.

Something about Richard stallman really is out of this world where he made people care about Open source in the first place.

I genuinely don't know how people can relicate it. I had even tried and gone through such phase once but the comments weren't really helpful back then on hackernews

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45558430 (Ask HN: Why are most people not interested in FOSS/OSS and can we change that)

▲

teekert 5 hours ago | parent [-]

As much as RMS meant for the world, he’s also a pretty petty person. He’s about freedom but mostly about user freedom, not creators freedom. I also went through such a phase but using words like “evil” is just too black and white. I don’t think he is a nice person to be around.l, judging from some podcasts and videos.

▲

trashb 4 hours ago | parent [-]

If there is one thing Stallman knows well is the way he uses words and I can assure you if he calls something "evil" that is exactly the word he meant to use.

> user freedom, not creators freedom

In his view users are the creators and creators are the users. The only freedom he asks you to give up is the freedom to limit the freedom of others.

	▲	teekert 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		RMS asks you to give something up: Your right to share a thing you made, under your conditions (which may be conditions even the receiving party agree on), nobody is forced in this situation, and then he calls that evil. I think that is wrong. I love FOSS, don't get me wrong. But people should be able to say: I made this, if you want to use it, it's under these condition or I won't share it. Again, imho the GPL is a blessing for humanity, and bless the people that choose it freely.