| ▲ | ViewTrick1002 7 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Renewables crash the money making potential of nuclear power. Why should someone buy ~18-24 cents/kWh new built nuclear power excluding backup, transmission costs, taxes, final waste deposit etc. when cheap renewables deliver? https://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Renewable-Energy/Wha... China is barely building nuclear power, in terms of their grid size. It peaked at 4.6% in 2021, now down to 4.3%. Compared to their renewable buildout the nuclear scheme is a token gesture to keep a nuclear industry alive if it would somehow end up delivering cheap electricity. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Moldoteck 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nuclear provides for about 4-5ct/kwh if built cheap, everything included, looking at swiss data. Chinese units are built for 2.5bn/unit, so probably even cheaper than that. But yes, china is far from what france or sweden did with nuclear per capita | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | boringg 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Again they aren't the same product. Everyone always thinks power is only about $/kwh especially in hackernews. That is a strong proponent of the product but most definitely not all of it. Solar just does not work for large scale industrial uses cases (99.99% uptime). Even with massive energy storage to try and cover the edges. Its a great combo but not comparable. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||