| ▲ | Dotnaught a day ago |
| By "shadowy cabal of European media elites," is Prince referring to elected Italian officials? What have they asked Cloudflare to ban? |
|
| ▲ | sva_ a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| No. To private entities (news outlets) who, according to this law, get to decide what websites to ban without a court order or any due process |
| |
| ▲ | bflesch a day ago | parent [-] | | The exact same thing is implemented in Germany already (DNS-level block), and I did not see Cloudflare CEO rage posting on Twitter about it. | | |
| ▲ | bigbuppo a day ago | parent | next [-] | | "you must block things in germany after it goes through a formal government process" versus "you must block things globally even for places not subject to italian law because an italian media company doesn't like it" There's more than a subtle difference betweeen the two. | |
| ▲ | hn_go_brrrrr a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Has Germany tried to fine Cloudflare over it? | |
| ▲ | sva_ a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'm in Germany and Cloudflare DNS doesn't Block eg Annas Archive for me, while my ISP does. I also don't reckon Germany tried to fine Cloudflare yet. So what is your point? | |
| ▲ | subsistence234 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | Because the German law only harms Germans, whereas the Italian law in question demands global bans. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | IncreasePosts a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The driving force behind this is getting pirated streams of football matches knocked offline. Currently by the time any action is taken the match is over, which is why they want the response-within-30-minutes. |
|
| ▲ | epolanski a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| This is about football streaming, the cabal media elites are right holders fighting illegal streams, which 1.1.1.1 bypasses even if filters are put at the ISP level. |
