| ▲ | uyzstvqs a day ago |
| Can't wait for a certain dictator to get a cellmate, so that our Persian and Kurdish friends can have freedom, including free unrestricted internet access. And for fellow HN users from there, here's some great stuff: https://yggdrasil-network.github.io/ https://bitchat.free/ |
|
| ▲ | switchbak a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| Sure, a US invasion of Iran would undoubtedly lead to good things. And how can you say the Kurds are friends of the USA (I'm presuming you mean friends of the USA) given how many times they've been abandoned? Just take a look at what happened to Libya, sometimes removing a "bad person" will cause a far worse situation to evolve. Like literal human slavery. I will never cease to be amazed at the amnesia that arises when folks in power decide now is a good time to sell a war to the people. |
| |
| ▲ | anakaine a day ago | parent | next [-] | | In Iran they have had several police forces join the protestors at this point. Hopefully its a theme that continues and includes the military. It only takes about 30% of the population supporting the regime plus military intervention to hold onto power. For some time now it seems that they've been below the 30% mark. | | |
| ▲ | cramsession a day ago | parent [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | StriverGuy a day ago | parent [-] | | How is that working out? | | |
| ▲ | cramsession a day ago | parent [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | andrepd a day ago | parent [-] | | Israel is a terrorist regime that commits genocide against Palestinians. What use is it if the ones fighting it are terrorists as well? In your hypothetical world where Iran is the strongest regional power, what does that accomplish? The Palestinians trade Israeli and Hamas's oppression for being a protectorate of the Islamic Republic of Iran? I never really understood this line of thinking. | | |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | themafia a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > a US invasion of Iran would undoubtedly lead to good things. I think their neighbor would disagree. > sell a war to the people. If you have to sell the war, then you have no business conducting it. | | |
| ▲ | ryan_n a day ago | parent [-] | | Not sure if you read the full parent comment, but they are agreeing with you in case you didn't realize. |
| |
| ▲ | kelvinjps10 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You also forget how panama Germany, Japan, South Korea are better now after removing their authoritarian regimes. | | |
| ▲ | oblio 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You're conveniently leaving out the other 80% of cases, which were failures. | | | |
| ▲ | lukan a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | Unfortunately, that was 75+ years ago and all the more recent examples were disasters as of my knowledge. | | |
| ▲ | kelvinjps10 a day ago | parent [-] | | Panama was on 1989 and Venezuela situation it's closer to that, than the middle East countries, We are united in this, more than 80% are against the current government and we even voted him out. There is not religious divide as it happens in those countries, even by ethnicity most people are just mixed. |
|
| |
| ▲ | DrProtic a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Even as we speak Kurds are getting attacked near Aleppo by US-backed ex-Al-Qaeda president of Syria. | |
| ▲ | cestith a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Sadly for the Kurds I’d say they are still pretty good friends to the US, as poorly as it’s been reciprocated. As for the rest of what you said, no notes. | |
| ▲ | keybored a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | All correct. But something needs to be frontloaded. 1. Even if removing <bad government> would be good for that country, that doesn’t give some other state the right to do it. We let these entities get away with murder because they are our friends and they have the biggest guns, that’s it. 2. Always interrogate the real reasons why a state is doing it. Now only after that we get to the facts like all those times it ended horribly for the people that <state> was supposed to help. | |
| ▲ | a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | m4rtink a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| More likely Asad will get another buddy to play Sounter Strike with - both he and Yanukovich must be bored to death by now in 2 people. |
|
| ▲ | andrepd a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yes, both Venezuela and (in your hypothetical) Iran would certainly be better and not worse after US intervention. How could they not, with such a great track record (Iraq, Lybia, Chile, Guatemala,...)! |
|
| ▲ | sigmonsays a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| how does Yggdrasil work if ipv6 is dead? |
| |
|
| ▲ | huragok a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| MbS? MbZ? |
|
| ▲ | aprilthird2021 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The Kurdish separatists and militants allied with the wrong country and they have very little chance of a state of their own. Iranians though, sure, things can change with or without the current govt |
| |
| ▲ | Qwertious a day ago | parent [-] | | >The Kurdish separatists and militants allied with the wrong country Which country is that? Last I checked, the Kurds were helping out the US a couple of years ago and got absolutely screwed. |
|
|
| ▲ | croes a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Like when the US removed Saddam? How did that wirk out? You need more of a plan than just get rid of a dictator. |
| |
| ▲ | swat535 a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Iran can end up in a much more dire state. It can end up another Syria / Libya.. or worse another aggressive group like Taliban can take hold of the central government. I also fear that the looming, imminent war between Israel and Iran is going to make things works. I'm expecting Israel to start a conflict within the next 6 months (or sooner) with the aid of United States. This is the weakest IRGC have been. Many of their allies have been crippled, they have water issues, economical issues and now protests. I think that securing Venezuela's oil aids this, should IRAN attempt to disrupt the Strait of Hormuz, it will allow Israel and United States to maintain reserves (to what extend, I don't know). I think things are going to get difficult for Iranian people, no matter what. | |
| ▲ | reissbaker a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It worked out poorly for America — we got stuck in a long expensive war that we got basically nothing from — but for the average Iraqi? I'd much rather be an Iraqi citizen than an Iranian one, and that wouldn't have been true in the 90s. Saddam was pretty evil — and a bad leader. Iraq's GDP per capita is 6x higher today than it was in 2002, a year before the invasion. | | |
| ▲ | csb6 a day ago | parent | next [-] | | It worked out pretty poorly for the average Iraqi. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis were killed (some estimates put it at around 1 million), and millions of people became refugees. Citing the relative GDP per capita number is reductive and doesn’t give a good picture of the average person’s life. | | |
| ▲ | flawn a day ago | parent | next [-] | | The GDP should be banned as a metric for being a life quality proxy, it's insane how so many people still refer to it although proven to neglect so many parts of what counts into LQ. To OP: Go check out Doughnut Economics - the book does a good job clearing up economical fallacies & mismodelling of such things. | |
| ▲ | croes a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | The whole mess led to ISIS and they claim victims in multiple countries. |
| |
| ▲ | ks2048 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | This is a pretty wild counter-factual. Reminds me of a report I saw about a hipster cafe existing in Baghdad 2025 as proof of success of the US invasion. What would the alternative have been? How do you factor in the loss of life? I suppose the real answer is asking Iraqis... |
| |
| ▲ | tonymet a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | We have a pro this time | | |
|
|
| ▲ | throwaway894345 a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I'm also curious about LoRA / sneakernet applications. Have those been widely used in cases of censorship? |
| |
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | anakaine a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | Lora is fine if you want to send a very short message. Its not useful for much else. Its also not a prevalent technology compared to general.internet/mobile phone. Organising resistance with it is the pipe dream of those who play with chips and antennas, but its not something thats going to happen when crowds and mobs form up in a situation like this. Not least because the hardware is not accessible to your average citizen. | | |
| ▲ | itintheory a day ago | parent | next [-] | | There are real-world examples of non-internet networks being created in authoritarian regimes. One example I've read about is in Cuba [1] but I presume there are others. [1] https://restofworld.org/2020/the-life-and-death-of-snet-hava... | |
| ▲ | throwaway894345 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah, that makes sense. I’ve curious if there are sneakernet things for communicating messages between passing mobile devices? Something that uses exist hardware and is actually used in practice. | | |
| ▲ | wiml a day ago | parent [-] | | There are things like Briar, Scuttlebutt, Berty, Serval, probably more I don't know of. |
|
|
|