| ▲ | jsheard 4 days ago | |||||||
Not to mention that fractional scaling is practically required in order to use the majority of higher DPI monitors on the market today. Manufacturers have settled on 4K at 27" or 32" as the new standard, which lends itself to running at around 150% scale, so to avoid fractional scaling you either need to give up on high DPI or pay at least twice as much for a niche 5K monitor which only does 60hz. | ||||||||
| ▲ | rabf 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Fractional scaling is a really bad solution. The correct way to fix this is to have the dpi aware applications and toolkits. This does in fact work and I have ran xfce under xorg for years now on hi-dpi screens just by setting a custom dpi and using a hi-dpi aware theme. When the goal is to have perfect output why do people suddenly want to jump to stretching images? | ||||||||
| ▲ | michaelmrose 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
The overwhelming majority of the low-DPI external displays at this point are 24-27 1080p Most high-DPI displays are simply the same thing with exactly twice the density. We settled on putting exactly twice as many pixels in the same panels because it facilitates integer scaling | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | toast0 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Why not give up on high DPI? Save money on the monitor, save money on the gpu (because it's pushing fewer pixels, you don't need as much oomph), save frustration with software. | ||||||||
| ||||||||