Remix.run Logo
bbor 4 hours ago

Reminds me of on interaction a few months ago where I mentioned the left-right spectrum in passing and someone accused me of making HN a worse place, only to call me a "snowflake" in their very next response! As usual, "things shouldn't be so political" is often uttered from a highly-political sense of discomfort. The quintessential example for me was its usage in US anti-desegregation rhetoric in the 1960s, alongside its resurgence in the anti-DEI movement today -- demanding that no one discuss our shared institutions is too often an endorsement of them, rather than an honest effort to focus on something else.

"toward the left" aside, it's always a little frustrating to read the ubiquitous "this place sucks" comments on here and Reddit. I have tons of problems with HN--both petty (markdown when??) and fundamental (SV/PE has metastasized in a discomforting way...)--but I'm still here because I love it, and think it's one of the best communities the internet has to offer.

Specific critiques of specific people or ideas are always welcome, but comments like "everyone here is curmudgeonly" just makes me wonder why they bother to log on in the first place...

ErroneousBosh 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> "things shouldn't be so political"

Skunk Anansi would likely disagree with that.

jimbokun 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah, you're an example of the tedious and unproductive political discourse being referenced.

As long as someone labels any argument as "DEI" they are the good guys and immune from critique or any burden of evidence.

100721 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Genuinely curious: would you mind please explaining to me how your contributions are more productive than the person you are responding to (read: attacking)?

It reads like you are upset at the poster using "DEI" and projecting your own behaviors onto them ("tedious and unproductive political discourse", "immune from critique or any burden of evidence").

bbor an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

...huh? Your takeaway from my comment was that I'm pro DEI, or that I intended my comment to be related to DEI in some way?

I can't quite tell if you're trying to support or attack that concept/acronym/cultural flash point, but regardless: kinda besides the point :)