Yeah, you're an example of the tedious and unproductive political discourse being referenced.

As long as someone labels any argument as "DEI" they are the good guys and immune from critique or any burden of evidence.

Genuinely curious: would you mind please explaining to me how your contributions are more productive than the person you are responding to (read: attacking)?

It reads like you are upset at the poster using "DEI" and projecting your own behaviors onto them ("tedious and unproductive political discourse", "immune from critique or any burden of evidence").

...huh? Your takeaway from my comment was that I'm pro DEI, or that I intended my comment to be related to DEI in some way?

I can't quite tell if you're trying to support or attack that concept/acronym/cultural flash point, but regardless: kinda besides the point :)