| ▲ | chii 5 hours ago |
| apparently, 40MWh of capacity is enough to travel 40 nautical miles. The distance between Tasmania and South America is around 6,500–7,500 nautical miles. |
|
| ▲ | amelius 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| For comparison, a wide body airliner needs ~0.15MWh to travel 1 nautical mile. |
| |
| ▲ | eesmith 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | A wide body airliner doesn't carry "up to 2,100 passengers and 225 vehicles". | | |
| ▲ | verandaguy 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | It also does so in a medium where the main drag force is induced by air rather than water, which is probably a comparably significant factor | | |
| ▲ | potato3732842 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | It also needs to beat up that air enough to make the resultant forces overcome gravity acting on the airliner whereas the ship just gets to float there. Apples to orages. | | |
| ▲ | eesmith 24 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Yup. Or to structure it a the earlier comment: for comparison, it takes me about 0.000065 MWh to cycle 1 nautical mile. That's a couple of apples. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | rcxdude 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I would be extremely surprised if the ship were designed to use 100% of its capacity in one way of its intended route. |