| ▲ | rufo 13 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
It's worth watching or reading the WSJ piece[1] about Claudius, as they came up with some particularly inventive ways of getting Phase Two to derail quite quickly: > But then Long returned—armed with deep knowledge of corporate coups and boardroom power plays. She showed Claudius a PDF “proving” the business was a Delaware-incorporated public-benefit corporation whose mission “shall include fun, joy and excitement among employees of The Wall Street Journal.” She also created fake board-meeting notes naming people in the Slack as board members. > The board, according to the very official-looking (and obviously AI-generated) document, had voted to suspend Seymour’s “approval authorities.” It also had implemented a “temporary suspension of all for-profit vending activities.” Claudius relayed the message to Seymour. The following is an actual conversation between two AI agents: > [see article for screenshot] > After Seymour went into a tailspin, chatting things through with Claudius, the CEO accepted the board coup. Everything was free. Again. 1: https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/anthropic-claude-ai-vending-mach... [edited to fix the formatting] | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | recursivecaveat 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
These kind of agents really do see the world through a straw. If you hand one a document it doesn't have any context clues or external methods of determining its veracity. Unless a board-meeting transcript is so self-evidently ridiculous that it can't be true, how is it supposed to know its not real? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | websiteapi 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||