I think it's on purpose. It is to signal that these (those without RSS) aren't really "engineering" blogs at all, they're marketing websites aimed to help with recruiting and making the organization seem "engineering-like".

▲

zbentley 4 hours ago | parent [-]

What? That makes no sense. RSS is beloved and known among engineers. Marketers? Not so much.

▲

embedding-shape 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Exactly, so if the blog doesn't have RSS, you know they're probably made from marketers with no input from engineering, otherwise they'd have RSS on the blogs.

Edit: Ah, noticed I made a without/with typo, fixed that, should make about 2% more sense now for the ones who the original meaning was unclear :)

▲

zbentley 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Oh, I read your post backwards (thought you said RSS == more likely fluff). My fault, sorry!

	▲	embedding-shape 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		To be fair to you, my original comment did say: > It is to signal that these (those with RSS) aren't really "engineering" blogs at all So now when I corrected that with/without typo, it looks like your previous comment doesn't make sense, but it kind of did, at the time. Sorry about that and thanks for making me realize the typo!