Exactly, so if the blog doesn't have RSS, you know they're probably made from marketers with no input from engineering, otherwise they'd have RSS on the blogs.

Edit: Ah, noticed I made a without/with typo, fixed that, should make about 2% more sense now for the ones who the original meaning was unclear :)

▲

zbentley 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Oh, I read your post backwards (thought you said RSS == more likely fluff). My fault, sorry!

	▲	embedding-shape 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		To be fair to you, my original comment did say: > It is to signal that these (those with RSS) aren't really "engineering" blogs at all So now when I corrected that with/without typo, it looks like your previous comment doesn't make sense, but it kind of did, at the time. Sorry about that and thanks for making me realize the typo!