The Readme is substantially LLM generated, yeah? Something about LLM readmes leave me cold. Including stuff like this feels like the sort of typical LLM time-wasting stuff that they output these days:

    Add 3D Model: Click "3D Model" → "Add 3D model (.glb)" → Select your file
    Add Image: Click "Image" → "Add image" → Select your file
    Add Text: Click "Text" or press T to add 3D text

To add a 3d model I click "3d Model" and then "add 3D model" and then add my 3d model. Very clear, but not usually what I look for in a readme. LLMs love this sort of stuff though.

To compare, the initial Readme (I guess this is a default re-frame readme?) doesn't have this same LLM vibe at all: https://github.com/ertugrulcetin/immersa/blob/7f585f5f544e2f...

▲ ertucetin a day ago | parent [-]

Yes, sorry about that if it annoyed you. I was too busy to write a good human-sound readme. It was an old project, and I wanted to release it as open source as quickly as possible.

▲

roywiggins a day ago | parent [-]

I think I don't mind LLM generated documentation per se if they're marked as such up front! It's more when I get halfway through and realize that this is probably an LLM output that I get annoyed.

	▲	utopiah a day ago \| parent [-]
		100%, it's all about disclosure to manage expectations.