| ▲ | PaulHoule 5 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
e.g. "tensors" are like "vectors" in they transform in a specific way when the coordinate system changes; what felt so magic about vectors as an undergrad was that they embody "the shape of space" and thus simplify calculations. If you didn't have vectors, Maxwell's equations would spill all over the place. Tensors on the other hand are used in places like continuum mechanics and general relativity where something more than vectors are called for but you're living in the same space(/time) with the same symmetries. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Joker_vD 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> If you didn't have vectors, Maxwell's equations would spill all over the place. What do you mean, "would": they did! :) The original equations had 20 separate equations, although Maxwell himself tried to reformulate them in quaternions. But if you look e.g. at works of Lorentz, or Einstein's famous 1905 paper, you'll see the fully-expanded version of them. The vector form really didn't fully catch until about the middle of the XX century. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | foxglacier 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Sure, but not all arrays are tensors. In continuum mechanics, you often represent tensors as matrices or vectors to exploit symmetry and then it's really confusing to keep calling them tensors because they don't behave like their tensor equivalent. | |||||||||||||||||