The "free" in this case is a verb. The objects are freed from the background.

Retr0id 19 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Until your comment I didn't realise I'd also read it wrong (despite getting the gist of it). Attempted rephrase of the original sentence:

Imagine history documentaries where they take an old photo, free objects from the background, and then move them round to give the illusion of parallax.

▲

necovek 18 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'd suggest a different verb like "detach" or "unlink".

▲

thenthenthen 15 hours ago | parent [-]

isolate from the background?

	▲	necovek 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Even better, agreed!

▲

nashashmi 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Free objects in the background.

	▲	Sharlin 14 hours ago \| parent [-]
		No, free objects in the foreground, from the background.

▲

tzot 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> Imagine history documentaries where they take an old photo, free objects from the background

Even using commas, if you leave the ambiguous “free” I suggest you prefix “objects” with “the” or “any”.

▲

19 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]